Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU)

Aichatou Mourfou; Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU)

Aichatou Mourfou, Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo

Published in American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business (Volume 7, Issue 1)

Received: 18 January 2021 Accepted: 27 January 2021 Published: 2 February 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This research examines the effect of different types of tax revenues on income inequality in WAEMU countries over the period 1996 to 2015. Double least squares (2SLS) are used as an estimation technique to analyze the effect of these different types of tax revenues, including total tax revenues (the sum of all revenues), direct tax revenues (which include profit and income taxes), domestic indirect tax revenues (e.g., value added tax and excise duties) and commercial tax revenues (e.g., customs duties). The results show that an increase in direct tax revenues leads to a reduction in income inequality. In other words, progressive income taxation allows for an efficient redistribution of income from richer to poorer people, which contributes strongly to the reduction of income inequality. On the other hand, indirect domestic tax revenues and commercial tax revenues are found to be neutral in income distribution. In fact, WAEMU countries, in order to compensate for the fiscal losses resulting from the reduction of customs tariffs, have adopted a reform of domestic taxation focused mainly on the development of non-progressive indirect taxes, i.e., taxes governed by liberal principles of fiscal neutrality: taxation must not disrupt individual choices of resource allocation. These tax reforms thus explain the neutrality of the effects of indirect taxation in the WAEMU zone. In the light of these results, the paper suggests that WAEMU countries should strengthen the progressivity of direct taxes and always maintain the neutrality of indirect taxes.

Published in	American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12
Page(s)	8-15
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Total Fiscal Pressure, Direct Fiscal Pressure, Domestic Indirect Fiscal Pressure, Commercial Fiscal Pressure, Income Inequality, 2SLS, WAEMU

References

[1]	African Development Bank database (ADB, 2018).
[2]	Agnello, L., & Sousa, R. M. (2014). How does fiscal consolidation impact on income inequality ?. Review of Income and Wealth Series 60, Number 4, 702-726.
[3]	Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, no. 2, 465-490.
[4]	Ball, L., Furceri, D., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2013). The distributional effects of fiscal consolidation. IMF Working Paper /13/151.
[5]	Barro, Robert J. (2000). Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5: 5–32.
[6]	Bird, R. M., & De Wulf, L. H. (1973). Taxation and Income Distribution in Latin America: A Critical Review of Empirical Studies. Staff Papers (International Monetary Fund), Vol. 20, No. 3, 639-682.
[7]	Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2005). The limited role of the personal income tax in developing countries. Journal of Asian Economics 16, 928–946.
[8]	Bird, R. M., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Torgler, B. (2004). Societal Institutions and Tax Effort in Developing Countries. International Studies Program, Working Paper 04-06.
[9]	Bobe, B. (1975). Budget de l'Etat et redistribution des revenus. Revue économique, volume 26, n°1,, 1-35.
[10]	Bulir, A. (2001). Income Inequality: Does inflation matter? IMF Staff Papers 48 (1), 139-159.
[11]	Chu, K.-y., Davoodi, H., & Gupta, S. (2000). Income distribution and tax and government social spending policies in developing countries. IMF Working Paper.
[12]	Dao, H., & Godbout, L. (2014). Le rôle de la fiscalité dans la réduction des inégalités: doit-on se soucier de la structure fiscale servant à prélever les recettes? L’Actualité économique, Revue d’analyse économique, vol. 90, no 4, décembre, 303-328.
[13]	De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. (2002). Education and income inequality: New evidence from cross-country Data. Review of Income and Wealth, 48 (3), 395-416.
[14]	Devarajan, S., & Hossain, S. (1998). The combined incidence of taxes and public expenditures in the Philippines. World Development Vol. 26, No. 6, 963-977.
[15]	De Wulf, L. (1975). Fiscal incidence studies in developing countries: survey and critique. Staff Papers (International Monetary Fund), Vol. 22, No. 1, 61-131.
[16]	De Wulf, L. (1977). Budget de l'Etat et redistribution des revenus: quelques aspects théoriques. Revue économique volume 28, n°2, 209-220.
[17]	Dischamps, J.-C. (1960). Comportements économiques et distorsions fiscales. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
[18]	Duncan, D., & Peter, K. S. (2008). Tax progressivity and income inequality. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Research Paper Series.
[19]	Gautier, J.-F. (2001). Taxation optimale et réformes fiscales: Une revue de littérature tropicalisée. DIAL (Developpement et insertion international).
[20]	Gemmell, N., & Morrissey, O. (2005). Distribution and poverty impacts of tax structure reform in developing countries: How little we know. Development Policy Review, 131-144.
[21]	Goni, E., Lopez, H., & Serven, L. (2011). Fiscal redistribution and income inequality in Latin America. World Development Vol. 39, No. 9, 1558–1569.
[22]	Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. The Journal of Political Economy, 80 (2), 223-255.
[23]	Harberger, A. C. (1962). The incidence of the corporation income tax. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 3, 215-240.
[24]	Kim, N. N., & Kim, J. (2013). Income Inequality in Korea, 1933-2010: Evidence from Income Tax Statistics. Working Paper 2013-05.
[25]	Kpodar, Kangni. (2007). Manuel d'initiation à stata (version 8). Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Developpement International (CERDI), Clermont-Ferrand.
[26]	Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1-28.
[27]	Kuznets, S. (1963). Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: VIII. Distribution of Income by Size. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 11, No. 2, Part 2, 1-80.
[28]	Martinez-Vazquez, J., Vulovic, V., & Dodson, B. M. (2012). The impact of tax and expenditure policies on income disttribution: Evidence from a large panel of countries. Hacienda Pública Española 200.
[29]	Mieszkowski, P. (1969). Association tax incidence theory: The effects of taxes on the distribution of income. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1103-1124.
[30]	Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 38, No. 2, 175-208.
[31]	Moyes, P., & Trannoy, A. (1999). Le quotient familial: une structure fiscale cohérente avec le critère de Lorenz relatif. Économie & prévision, n°138-139, 1999-2-3. Economie des inégalités, 111-124.
[32]	Mulas-Granados, C. (2005). Fiscal ddjustments and the short-term trade-off between economic growth and equality. Hacienda Pública Española / Revista de Economía Pública, 172, 61-92.
[33]	Mwega, R. M. (1986). Incidence of taxes and transfers in Kenya: A general equilibrium analysis. Eastern African Economic Review, Vol 2 (June), 6-13.
[34]	Paulus, A., Čok, M., Figari, F., Hegedüs, P., Kump, N., Lelkes, O.,... Võrk, A. (2009). The effects of taxes and benefits on income distribution in the enlarged EU. EUROMOD Working Paper, No. EM8/09, University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), Colchester.
[35]	Peter, K. S., Buttrick, S., & Duncan, D. (2009). Global Reform of Personal Income Taxation, 1981-2005: Evidence from 189 Countries. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4228.
[36]	Piketty, T. (2013). Le capital au xxie siècle. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
[37]	Piketty, t., & Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the united states, 1913–1998*. The quarterly journal of economics vol. cxviii february issue 1.
[38]	Ramsey, F. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. The economic journal, volume 37, Issue 145, 47-61.
[39]	Sahn, D., & Younger, S. (1998). Poverty and Fiscal Policy: Microeconomic Evidence. Mimeograph; Cornell University.
[40]	Solt, F. (2019). Measuring Income Inequality Across Countries and Over Time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. SWIID Version 8.1, May 2019.
[41]	Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID). (2019).
[42]	Westlake, M. (1973). Tax Evasion, tax Incidence and the Distribution of Income in Kenya. Eastern Africa Economic Review, Vol. 5, no. 1, 1-27.
[43]	Woo, J., Bova, E., Kinda, T., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013). Distributional consequences of fiscal consolidation and the role of Fiscal Policy: What do the data say? IMF Working Paper.
[44]	World Development Indicators database (2018).
[45]	Worldwide Governance Indicators database (2018).
[46]	Younger, S. D. (1993). Estimating Tax Incidence in Ghana: An Exercise Using Household Data. Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program Working Paper No. 48.
[47]	Younger, S. D., Sahn, D. E., Haggblade, S., & Dorosh, P. A. (1999). Tax incidence in Madagascar: An analysis using household data. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 303–331.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Aichatou Mourfou, Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo. (2021). Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU). American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 7(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Aichatou Mourfou; Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo. Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU). Am. J. Theor. Appl. Bus. 2021, 7(1), 8-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Aichatou Mourfou, Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo. Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU). Am J Theor Appl Bus. 2021;7(1):8-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12,
  author = {Aichatou Mourfou and Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo},
  title = {Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU)},
  journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {8-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtab.20210701.12},
  abstract = {This research examines the effect of different types of tax revenues on income inequality in WAEMU countries over the period 1996 to 2015. Double least squares (2SLS) are used as an estimation technique to analyze the effect of these different types of tax revenues, including total tax revenues (the sum of all revenues), direct tax revenues (which include profit and income taxes), domestic indirect tax revenues (e.g., value added tax and excise duties) and commercial tax revenues (e.g., customs duties). The results show that an increase in direct tax revenues leads to a reduction in income inequality. In other words, progressive income taxation allows for an efficient redistribution of income from richer to poorer people, which contributes strongly to the reduction of income inequality. On the other hand, indirect domestic tax revenues and commercial tax revenues are found to be neutral in income distribution. In fact, WAEMU countries, in order to compensate for the fiscal losses resulting from the reduction of customs tariffs, have adopted a reform of domestic taxation focused mainly on the development of non-progressive indirect taxes, i.e., taxes governed by liberal principles of fiscal neutrality: taxation must not disrupt individual choices of resource allocation. These tax reforms thus explain the neutrality of the effects of indirect taxation in the WAEMU zone. In the light of these results, the paper suggests that WAEMU countries should strengthen the progressivity of direct taxes and always maintain the neutrality of indirect taxes.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU)
AU  - Aichatou Mourfou
AU  - Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo
Y1  - 2021/02/02
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12
T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
SP  - 8
EP  - 15
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7842
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12
AB  - This research examines the effect of different types of tax revenues on income inequality in WAEMU countries over the period 1996 to 2015. Double least squares (2SLS) are used as an estimation technique to analyze the effect of these different types of tax revenues, including total tax revenues (the sum of all revenues), direct tax revenues (which include profit and income taxes), domestic indirect tax revenues (e.g., value added tax and excise duties) and commercial tax revenues (e.g., customs duties). The results show that an increase in direct tax revenues leads to a reduction in income inequality. In other words, progressive income taxation allows for an efficient redistribution of income from richer to poorer people, which contributes strongly to the reduction of income inequality. On the other hand, indirect domestic tax revenues and commercial tax revenues are found to be neutral in income distribution. In fact, WAEMU countries, in order to compensate for the fiscal losses resulting from the reduction of customs tariffs, have adopted a reform of domestic taxation focused mainly on the development of non-progressive indirect taxes, i.e., taxes governed by liberal principles of fiscal neutrality: taxation must not disrupt individual choices of resource allocation. These tax reforms thus explain the neutrality of the effects of indirect taxation in the WAEMU zone. In the light of these results, the paper suggests that WAEMU countries should strengthen the progressivity of direct taxes and always maintain the neutrality of indirect taxes.
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Aichatou Mourfou

Department of Economics and Management, University Thomas Sankara, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso
Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo

PhD School, University Aube Nouvelle, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Aichatou Mourfou, Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo. (2021). Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU). American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 7(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Aichatou Mourfou; Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo. Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU). Am. J. Theor. Appl. Bus. 2021, 7(1), 8-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Aichatou Mourfou, Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo. Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU). Am J Theor Appl Bus. 2021;7(1):8-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12,
  author = {Aichatou Mourfou and Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo},
  title = {Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU)},
  journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {8-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtab.20210701.12},
  abstract = {This research examines the effect of different types of tax revenues on income inequality in WAEMU countries over the period 1996 to 2015. Double least squares (2SLS) are used as an estimation technique to analyze the effect of these different types of tax revenues, including total tax revenues (the sum of all revenues), direct tax revenues (which include profit and income taxes), domestic indirect tax revenues (e.g., value added tax and excise duties) and commercial tax revenues (e.g., customs duties). The results show that an increase in direct tax revenues leads to a reduction in income inequality. In other words, progressive income taxation allows for an efficient redistribution of income from richer to poorer people, which contributes strongly to the reduction of income inequality. On the other hand, indirect domestic tax revenues and commercial tax revenues are found to be neutral in income distribution. In fact, WAEMU countries, in order to compensate for the fiscal losses resulting from the reduction of customs tariffs, have adopted a reform of domestic taxation focused mainly on the development of non-progressive indirect taxes, i.e., taxes governed by liberal principles of fiscal neutrality: taxation must not disrupt individual choices of resource allocation. These tax reforms thus explain the neutrality of the effects of indirect taxation in the WAEMU zone. In the light of these results, the paper suggests that WAEMU countries should strengthen the progressivity of direct taxes and always maintain the neutrality of indirect taxes.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Tax Revenue Mobilization on Income Inequalities in West African Economic and Monetary Union Countries (WAEMU)
AU  - Aichatou Mourfou
AU  - Idrissa Mohamed Ouedraogo
Y1  - 2021/02/02
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12
T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
SP  - 8
EP  - 15
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7842
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210701.12
AB  - This research examines the effect of different types of tax revenues on income inequality in WAEMU countries over the period 1996 to 2015. Double least squares (2SLS) are used as an estimation technique to analyze the effect of these different types of tax revenues, including total tax revenues (the sum of all revenues), direct tax revenues (which include profit and income taxes), domestic indirect tax revenues (e.g., value added tax and excise duties) and commercial tax revenues (e.g., customs duties). The results show that an increase in direct tax revenues leads to a reduction in income inequality. In other words, progressive income taxation allows for an efficient redistribution of income from richer to poorer people, which contributes strongly to the reduction of income inequality. On the other hand, indirect domestic tax revenues and commercial tax revenues are found to be neutral in income distribution. In fact, WAEMU countries, in order to compensate for the fiscal losses resulting from the reduction of customs tariffs, have adopted a reform of domestic taxation focused mainly on the development of non-progressive indirect taxes, i.e., taxes governed by liberal principles of fiscal neutrality: taxation must not disrupt individual choices of resource allocation. These tax reforms thus explain the neutrality of the effects of indirect taxation in the WAEMU zone. In the light of these results, the paper suggests that WAEMU countries should strengthen the progressivity of direct taxes and always maintain the neutrality of indirect taxes.
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download