Objective: To evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic care treatment on Cognitive impairment patients. Methods: We invested 60 patients to join our study who were diagnosed as cerebrovascular disease or alzheimer disease, the diseases are cognitive impairment. Their diagnose time is from January 2019 to December 2019. We randomly assign the participants to two groups, that include control group (n=30) and intervention group (n=30). In control group, participants receive conventional responsibility mode of nursing. Intervention group participants receive humanistic care model in treatment process. Result: In Unplanned extubation rate of rTMS, the control group has more case of Unplanned extubation, it also has higher Unplanned extubation rate than that of intervention group [3 (10.0%) vs 7 (23.3%)]. In incidence of agitation, it shows the cases of intervention group are less than that of control group, and it is statistical significance (8 vs 13, p=0.014). In accurate response research, the intervention group has better performance in accurate response test, its accurate response rate is 86.7% and the case of accurate response is 26, that is better than that of control group in our research result. Conclusion: The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic care treatment is good for improve treatment outcome of cognitive impairment.
| Published in | American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12 |
| Page(s) | 30-32 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cognitive Impairment, rTMS, Humanistic Care
| [1] | Stilling JM, Monchi O, Amoozegar F, Debert CT. Transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS) for the treatment of headache: a systematic review. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2019; 59 (3): 339-357. |
| [2] | Yan T, Xie Q, Zheng Z, Zou K, Wang L. Different frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2017; 89: 125-135. |
| [3] | Kennedy NI, Lee WH, Frangou S. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on the symptom dimensions of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Psychiatr. 2018; 49: 69-77. |
| [4] | Aleman A, Enriquez-Geppert S, Knegtering H, Dlabac-de Lange JJ. Moderate effects of noninvasive brain stimulation of the frontal cortex for improving negative symptoms in schizophrenia: meta-analysis of controlled trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018; 89: 111-118. |
| [5] | He H, Lu J, Yang L, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating the symptoms of schizophrenia: a PRISMA compliant meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 128 (5): 716-724. |
| [6] | Rabany L, Deutsch L, Levkovitz Y. Double-blind, randomized sham controlled study of deep TMS add-on treatment for negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 2016; 28 (7): 686-690. |
| [7] | Khedr EM, Kotb H, Kamel NF, et al. Long-lasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J of Neurol, Neurosurg, and Psychiatry. 2015; 76: 833–838. |
| [8] | Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Neuron. 2017; 55: 187–99. |
| [9] | Connell NE, Marston L, Spencer S, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 4: CD008208. |
| [10] | Lan MJ, Chhetry BT, Liston C, Mann JJ, Dubin M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces brain morphological changes in regions associated with a treatment resistant major depressive episode: an exploratory analysis. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9 (4): 577–583. |
| [11] | Noda Y, Silverstein WK, Barr MS, Vila-Rodriguez F, Downar J, Rajji TK, et al. Neurobiological mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in depression: a systematic review. Psychol. Med. 2015; 45 (16): 3411–3432. |
| [12] | He Y, Li K, Chen Q, Yin J, Bai D. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery for patients with stroke: a PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta- analysis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2019; 99 (2): 99–108. |
| [13] | Sharma D, Mazta S, Parashar A. Prevalence of cognitive impairment and related factors among elderly: a population-based study. J. Dr. NTR Univ. Heal. Sci. 2016; 2: 171. |
| [14] | Poddar K, Kant S, Singh A, Singh TB. An epidemiological study of dementia among the habitants of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2015; 14: 164–168. |
| [15] | Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Lee S, & Suzuki T. Cognitive impairment and disability in older japanese adults. PloS One. 2016; 11 (7): e0158720. |
| [16] | Jiang CG, Zhang T, Yue FG, et al. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of patients with chronic primary insomnia. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013; 67 (1): 169-173. |
| [17] | Lanza G, Cantone M, Lanuzza B, et al. Distinctive patterns of cortical excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea syn-drome, restless legs syndrome, insomnia, and sleep deprivation. Sleep Med Rev 2015; 19: 39-50. |
| [18] | Furukawa TA, Cipriani A, Atkinson LZ, et al. Placebo response rates in anti-depressant trials: a systematic review of published and unpublished double-blind randomised controlled studies. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3 (11): 1059-1066. |
| [19] | Brunoni AR, Chaimani A, Moffa AH, Razza LB, Gattaz WF, Daskalakis ZJ, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017; 74: 143-152. |
APA Style
Yingxue Zhong, Danfeng Jiang, Guoqiang Zheng. (2020). Evaluating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic Care Treatment on Cognitive Impairment Patients. American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 8(2), 30-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12
ACS Style
Yingxue Zhong; Danfeng Jiang; Guoqiang Zheng. Evaluating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic Care Treatment on Cognitive Impairment Patients. Am. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020, 8(2), 30-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12
AMA Style
Yingxue Zhong, Danfeng Jiang, Guoqiang Zheng. Evaluating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic Care Treatment on Cognitive Impairment Patients. Am J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020;8(2):30-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12,
author = {Yingxue Zhong and Danfeng Jiang and Guoqiang Zheng},
title = {Evaluating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic Care Treatment on Cognitive Impairment Patients},
journal = {American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience},
volume = {8},
number = {2},
pages = {30-32},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpn.20200802.12},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic care treatment on Cognitive impairment patients. Methods: We invested 60 patients to join our study who were diagnosed as cerebrovascular disease or alzheimer disease, the diseases are cognitive impairment. Their diagnose time is from January 2019 to December 2019. We randomly assign the participants to two groups, that include control group (n=30) and intervention group (n=30). In control group, participants receive conventional responsibility mode of nursing. Intervention group participants receive humanistic care model in treatment process. Result: In Unplanned extubation rate of rTMS, the control group has more case of Unplanned extubation, it also has higher Unplanned extubation rate than that of intervention group [3 (10.0%) vs 7 (23.3%)]. In incidence of agitation, it shows the cases of intervention group are less than that of control group, and it is statistical significance (8 vs 13, p=0.014). In accurate response research, the intervention group has better performance in accurate response test, its accurate response rate is 86.7% and the case of accurate response is 26, that is better than that of control group in our research result. Conclusion: The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic care treatment is good for improve treatment outcome of cognitive impairment.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic Care Treatment on Cognitive Impairment Patients AU - Yingxue Zhong AU - Danfeng Jiang AU - Guoqiang Zheng Y1 - 2020/06/04 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12 T2 - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience JF - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience JO - American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience SP - 30 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-426X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpn.20200802.12 AB - Objective: To evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic care treatment on Cognitive impairment patients. Methods: We invested 60 patients to join our study who were diagnosed as cerebrovascular disease or alzheimer disease, the diseases are cognitive impairment. Their diagnose time is from January 2019 to December 2019. We randomly assign the participants to two groups, that include control group (n=30) and intervention group (n=30). In control group, participants receive conventional responsibility mode of nursing. Intervention group participants receive humanistic care model in treatment process. Result: In Unplanned extubation rate of rTMS, the control group has more case of Unplanned extubation, it also has higher Unplanned extubation rate than that of intervention group [3 (10.0%) vs 7 (23.3%)]. In incidence of agitation, it shows the cases of intervention group are less than that of control group, and it is statistical significance (8 vs 13, p=0.014). In accurate response research, the intervention group has better performance in accurate response test, its accurate response rate is 86.7% and the case of accurate response is 26, that is better than that of control group in our research result. Conclusion: The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Humanistic care treatment is good for improve treatment outcome of cognitive impairment. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: