Sonic Crystal Noise Barriers (SCNBs) exploit Bragg scattering in periodic scatterer arrays to attenuate road traffic noise without the visual and aerodynamic penalties of solid walls. Despite growing computational interest, a persistent gap remains between idealised simulation predictions and measured laboratory performance, largely because viscothermal dissipation and diffraction losses are routinely omitted from numerical models. This study presents a systematic, two-phase hybrid methodology to address this gap: first, forty-four Finite Element Method (FEM) configurations were evaluated in COMSOL Multiphysics by varying filling fraction (ff = 0.1-0.5), cylinder diameter (d = 0.02-0.1 m), and lattice constant (α) to identify parameter-dependent trends in A-weighted transmission loss (TLa). Second, fifteen representative prototype configurations were fabricated from acrylic and tested inside an anechoic/reverberation acoustic chamber to validate the computational model across the full 50-4000 Hz range. Simulations predicted a peak TLa of 45.8 dB for ff = 0.3, d = 0.07 m, α = 0.113 m in a 2 × 4 array, while the highest experimentally measured TLa was 10.1 dB for ff = 0.5, d = 0.07 m, α = 0.088 m in a 2 × 6 array. Although quantitative agreement was not achieved, the rank ordering of configurations by TLa was consistent between simulation and experiment across all five filling fractions, confirming the predictive reliability of the computational model for comparative design screening. The observed over-prediction is attributed primarily to viscothermal energy losses, diffraction effects, and material absorption not captured in the idealised 2D lossless model, which reveals that cylinder diameter and lattice constant are the primary drivers of simulated TLa, whereas fill fraction dominates the experimental TLa response, with a 2-row depth identified as the optimal configuration depth for mid-range diameters. These findings provide a validated, data-driven design framework for cost-effective SCNB development and clarify the modelling corrections required to improve quantitative fidelity.
| Published in | American Journal of Physics and Applications (Volume 14, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11 |
| Page(s) | 50-67 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Sonic Crystal, Noise Barrier, Transmission Loss, Filling Fraction, Finite Element Method, Acoustic Chamber, COMSOL Multiphysics, Viscothermal Effect
| [1] | L. Fredianelli, L. Del Pizzo, and G. Licitra, “Recent developments in sonic crystals as barriers for road traffic noise mitigation,” Environments, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 14, 2019. |
| [2] | G. C. Tocci, Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1993, p.3532. |
| [3] |
Federal Highway Administration, U. S. Dept. of Transportation, “Highway traffic noise barriers at a glance.” [Online]. Available:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/noise_barriers/design_construction/keepdown.cfm |
| [4] | M. P. Peíó-Torres, M. J. Parrilla Navarro, M. Ferri, J. M. Bravo, J. V. Sánchez-Pérez, and J. Redondo, “Sonic crystals acoustic screens and diffusers,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 148, pp. 399–408, 2019. |
| [5] | P. Gulia and A. Gupta, “Multi-directional sound reduction by slitted sonic crystal,” in Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 1099–1108. |
| [6] | F. Koussa, J. Defrance, P. Jean, and P. Blanc-Benon, “Acoustical efficiency of a sonic crystal assisted noise barrier,” Acta Acust. United Acust., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 399–409, 2013. |
| [7] | L. Onrubia-Fontangordo, J. M. Bravo Plana-Sala, S. Castiñeira-Ibáñez, and J. V. Sánchez-Pérez, “Design and validation of a comprehensive model to characterize sonic crystals acoustic screens in the low frequency regime,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 224, p. 110102, 2024. |
| [8] | J. Redondo, D. Ramírez-Solana, and R. Picó, “Increasing the insertion loss of sonic crystal noise barriers with Helmholtz resonators,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 3662, 2023. |
| [9] | X. Qin, A. Ni, Z. Chen, M. Fang, and Y. Li, “Numerical modeling and field test of sonic crystal acoustic barriers,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 16289–16304, 2023. |
| [10] | D. Ramírez-Solana, J. Galiana-Nieves, R. Picó, J. Redondo, and V. Sangiorgio, “Sonic crystal noise barrier with resonant cavities for train brake noise mitigation,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 7, p. 2753, 2024. |
| [11] | I. Kralov, K. Nedelchev, E. Gieva, and I. N. Ruskova, “Investigation of the influence of the number of rows in sonic crystal acoustic barriers with cylindrical elements on their acoustic characteristics,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2333, p. 060009, 2021. |
| [12] | M. Ibarias, V. Cutanda Henríquez, F. Lucklum, and J. Sánchez-Dehesa, “Broadband acoustic absorption at low frequencies by slabs and clusters made of hard cylindrical rods,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 136, p. 044901, 2024. |
| [13] | M. Molérón, M. Serra-Garcia, and C. Daraio, “Visco-thermal effects in acoustic metamaterials: from total transmission to total reflection and high absorption,” New J. Phys., vol. 18, no. 3, p. 033003, 2016. |
| [14] | X.-H. Zhang and Z. Qu, “Viscous and thermal dissipation during the sound propagation in the continuously graded phononic crystals,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 176, p. 108606, 2021. |
| [15] | “COMSOL Multiphysics® software – understand, predict, and optimize,” COMSOL Inc. [Online]. Available: |
| [16] |
“Perfectly matched layers (PMLs),” COMSOL Documentation, Pressure Acoustics Module User’s Guide. [Online]. Available:
https://doc.comsol.com/5.5/doc/com.comsol.help.aco/aco_ug_pressure.05.106.html |
| [17] |
International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61672-1: 2013 – Electroacoustics: Sound Level Meters, Part 1: Specifications. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC, 2013. [Online]. Available:
https://reference.globalspec.com/standard/3890183/iec-61672-1-2013 |
| [18] |
G. S. Sharma, “Acoustic performance of periodic composite materials,” presented at Acoustics 2015 Hunter Valley, Australian Acoustical Society, Hunter Valley, Australia, Nov. 15–18, 2015. [Online]. Available:
https://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference_proceedings/AAS2015/papers/p75.pdf |
| [19] | R. G. Sargent, “Verification and validation of simulation models,” in Proc. 2011 Winter Simulation Conf. (WSC), Phoenix, AZ, 2011, pp. 183–198. |
| [20] | D. Handayani, E. F. Ferdyan, S. As’ad, I. Yahya, and Ubaidillah, “Sound barrier model with sonic crystal structure for attenuating noise due to road transportation activity,” Evergreen, vol. 11, no. 3, 2024. |
| [21] | F. Brinkmann, L. Aspöck, D. Ackermann, S. Lepa, M. Vorländer, and S. Weinzierl, “A round robin on room acoustical simulation and auralization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 145, no. 4, p. 2746, 2019. |
| [22] | X. Qin, W. Yang, Z. Zhang, and Z. Chen, “Research on the design and noise reduction performance of periodic noise barriers based on nested structure,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 466, p. 143708, 2024. |
| [23] | J. Galiana Nieves, R. Picó, R. del Rey, J. Alba, and J. Redondo, “Assessment of the sound reduction index provided by noise barriers with low sound insulation,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 221, p. 109967, 2024. |
| [24] | Mohapatra, K., & Jena, D. P. (2023). Numerical and experimental methods to measure the acoustic performance of sonic crystal noise barrier. Building Acoustics, 30(3), 339-356. |
APA Style
Lam, K., Wat, C., Ahmed, S. B., Tang, C., Ruan, H., et al. (2026). Development of Sonic Crystal Noise Barriers with Simulations and Experimental Validations in Acoustic Chamber. American Journal of Physics and Applications, 14(4), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11
ACS Style
Lam, K.; Wat, C.; Ahmed, S. B.; Tang, C.; Ruan, H., et al. Development of Sonic Crystal Noise Barriers with Simulations and Experimental Validations in Acoustic Chamber. Am. J. Phys. Appl. 2026, 14(4), 50-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11,
author = {King-cheong Lam and Chin-to Wat and Syed Bilal Ahmed and Chak-yin Tang and Hai-hui Ruan and Chi-ho Wong and Kia Ho-yin Tsang and Ricky Kai-long Mak and Wai-keung Anthony Loh},
title = {Development of Sonic Crystal Noise Barriers with Simulations and Experimental Validations in Acoustic Chamber},
journal = {American Journal of Physics and Applications},
volume = {14},
number = {4},
pages = {50-67},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpa.20261404.11},
abstract = {Sonic Crystal Noise Barriers (SCNBs) exploit Bragg scattering in periodic scatterer arrays to attenuate road traffic noise without the visual and aerodynamic penalties of solid walls. Despite growing computational interest, a persistent gap remains between idealised simulation predictions and measured laboratory performance, largely because viscothermal dissipation and diffraction losses are routinely omitted from numerical models. This study presents a systematic, two-phase hybrid methodology to address this gap: first, forty-four Finite Element Method (FEM) configurations were evaluated in COMSOL Multiphysics by varying filling fraction (ff = 0.1-0.5), cylinder diameter (d = 0.02-0.1 m), and lattice constant (α) to identify parameter-dependent trends in A-weighted transmission loss (TLa). Second, fifteen representative prototype configurations were fabricated from acrylic and tested inside an anechoic/reverberation acoustic chamber to validate the computational model across the full 50-4000 Hz range. Simulations predicted a peak TLa of 45.8 dB for ff = 0.3, d = 0.07 m, α = 0.113 m in a 2 × 4 array, while the highest experimentally measured TLa was 10.1 dB for ff = 0.5, d = 0.07 m, α = 0.088 m in a 2 × 6 array. Although quantitative agreement was not achieved, the rank ordering of configurations by TLa was consistent between simulation and experiment across all five filling fractions, confirming the predictive reliability of the computational model for comparative design screening. The observed over-prediction is attributed primarily to viscothermal energy losses, diffraction effects, and material absorption not captured in the idealised 2D lossless model, which reveals that cylinder diameter and lattice constant are the primary drivers of simulated TLa, whereas fill fraction dominates the experimental TLa response, with a 2-row depth identified as the optimal configuration depth for mid-range diameters. These findings provide a validated, data-driven design framework for cost-effective SCNB development and clarify the modelling corrections required to improve quantitative fidelity.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Development of Sonic Crystal Noise Barriers with Simulations and Experimental Validations in Acoustic Chamber AU - King-cheong Lam AU - Chin-to Wat AU - Syed Bilal Ahmed AU - Chak-yin Tang AU - Hai-hui Ruan AU - Chi-ho Wong AU - Kia Ho-yin Tsang AU - Ricky Kai-long Mak AU - Wai-keung Anthony Loh Y1 - 2026/09/20 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11 T2 - American Journal of Physics and Applications JF - American Journal of Physics and Applications JO - American Journal of Physics and Applications SP - 50 EP - 67 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-4308 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20261404.11 AB - Sonic Crystal Noise Barriers (SCNBs) exploit Bragg scattering in periodic scatterer arrays to attenuate road traffic noise without the visual and aerodynamic penalties of solid walls. Despite growing computational interest, a persistent gap remains between idealised simulation predictions and measured laboratory performance, largely because viscothermal dissipation and diffraction losses are routinely omitted from numerical models. This study presents a systematic, two-phase hybrid methodology to address this gap: first, forty-four Finite Element Method (FEM) configurations were evaluated in COMSOL Multiphysics by varying filling fraction (ff = 0.1-0.5), cylinder diameter (d = 0.02-0.1 m), and lattice constant (α) to identify parameter-dependent trends in A-weighted transmission loss (TLa). Second, fifteen representative prototype configurations were fabricated from acrylic and tested inside an anechoic/reverberation acoustic chamber to validate the computational model across the full 50-4000 Hz range. Simulations predicted a peak TLa of 45.8 dB for ff = 0.3, d = 0.07 m, α = 0.113 m in a 2 × 4 array, while the highest experimentally measured TLa was 10.1 dB for ff = 0.5, d = 0.07 m, α = 0.088 m in a 2 × 6 array. Although quantitative agreement was not achieved, the rank ordering of configurations by TLa was consistent between simulation and experiment across all five filling fractions, confirming the predictive reliability of the computational model for comparative design screening. The observed over-prediction is attributed primarily to viscothermal energy losses, diffraction effects, and material absorption not captured in the idealised 2D lossless model, which reveals that cylinder diameter and lattice constant are the primary drivers of simulated TLa, whereas fill fraction dominates the experimental TLa response, with a 2-row depth identified as the optimal configuration depth for mid-range diameters. These findings provide a validated, data-driven design framework for cost-effective SCNB development and clarify the modelling corrections required to improve quantitative fidelity. VL - 14 IS - 4 ER -