This paper examines solar power technologies growth in the United States (U.S.) considering the four pillars of the energy system: socio-cultural, policy, science & technology, and markets & companies. The study analyzed the growing use of Photovoltaic panels (PV) technology. The First Solar company was analyzed as a case study to understand the impact of the different energy pillars and challenges on PV technology in the U.S. As a general observation, it was found that solar power in the U.S. is an incredibly fast-growing technology. Solar power does however still only make up a relatively small fraction of the total power consumption in the U.S. - in 2020 of approximately 1.32%. Considering these two observations, solar power in the U.S. is currently in the middle of being a niche-technology and forming its own energy regime. The possibilities for solar power to grow further into a solid regime in the U.S. are supported by developments concerning the four pillars of the energy system. For the science and technology pillar we will focus on main technological developments and R&D. The markets-companies pillar will be discussed by considering the characteristics of main company First Solar and market developments. The social and cultural pillar will be explored by looking at the role of citizens, NGOs, and relevant cultural perspectives. For the policy pillar, we will focus on federal policy, some main policy instruments and implementation problems. Eventually this study explores two different scenarios of solar energy in the U.S: a business-as-usual scenario and a maximally optimistic scenario. In the first scenario solar power production will increase to about 5% by 2031 of the total power demand in the U.S. In the optimistic scenario it will be around 17% of the total power production in the U.S, an increase by a factor 3.4, depending on developments in the four pillars.
| Published in | American Journal of Modern Energy (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-16 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Solar Energy in the U.S, Photovoltaic PV Technology, Energy Policy, Innovation, Citizens’ Involvement, Energy Regime
| [1] | Victoria Simpson (May 6, 2020). "Countries with Which the US Shares Maritime Borders". WorldAtlas. |
| [2] | L. B. Shrestha. (2011). Changing demographic profile of the United States. DIANE Publishing. |
| [3] | Frank Wallace & Adam Gopnik (2021, November 14). United States. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/place/United-States |
| [4] | U.S. energy consumption by source and sector, 2020, iea, U.S. energy consumption by source and sector, 2020 (eia.gov). |
| [5] | Renewables became the second-most prevalent U.S. electricity source in 2020, July 28, 2021, eia, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=48896#:~:text=In%202020%2C%20renewable%20energy%20sources,generated%20in%20the%20United%20States. |
| [6] | BrightEyeSolar, “A Brief History Of Solar Energy In The U.S.”, April 12 2017 https://brighteyesolar.com/blog/brief-history-solar-energy-us/ |
| [7] | Office of energy efficiency and renewable energy, “Solar Energy in the United States”, 2021 https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-energy-united-states |
| [8] | SEIA, “Solar Industry Growing at a Record Pace”, 2021, https://www.seia.org/solar-industry-research-data/ |
| [9] | Eric Larsson, “Economic Factors Drive Wind and Solar Growth”, PowerMag, December 10 2020 https://www.powermag.com/economic-factors-drive-wind-and-solar-growth/ |
| [10] | Congressional Research Service, "Energy Policy Act of 2005: Summary and Analysis of Enacted Provisions," March 8, 2006. |
| [11] | SEIA, “Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC)”, 2020, https://www.seia.org/initiatives/solar-investment-tax-credit-itc |
| [12] | David J. Hess. (2016). “The politics of niche-regime conflicts: Distributed solar energy in the United States, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions”, 19, 42-50, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422415300174 |
| [13] | Atalay Atasu, Serasu Duran & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, “The Dark Side of Solar Power”, Harvard business review, June 18, 2021. https://hbr.org/2021/06/the-dark-side-of-solar-power |
| [14] | The White House, “Fact Sheet: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies”, April 22, 2021 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/22/fact-sheet-president-biden-sets-2030-greenhouse-gas-pollution-reduction-targe |
| [15] | F. W. Geels. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1 (1), 24-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002). |
| [16] | World energy use in 2010: over 5% growth, 5 May 2011, EnerData, G 20 Increased Energy Demand in 2010 Strongly | Enerdata. |
| [17] | Y. Chu & P. Meisen, (2011). Review and comparison of different solar energy technologies. Global Energy Network Institute (GENI). |
| [18] | A. Shahsavari, & M. Akbari. (2018). Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 275-291. |
| [19] | M. Zubair, A. Bilal Awan, A. Al-Ahmadi & A. G. Abo-Khalil. (2018). NPC based design optimization for a net zero office building in hot climates with PV panels as shading device. Energies, 11 (6), 1391. |
| [20] | Explore examples of solar heating & cooling technologies in real-world applications, 2020, Solar Heating & Cooling | SEIA. |
| [21] | E. Goffman. (2008). Why not the sun? Advantages of and problems with solar energy. Journal of ProQuest Discovery Guides. |
| [22] | U.S. IEA, "Solar PV," Technology Briefs, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2016. |
| [23] | Vikram Aggarwal, Most efficient solar panels: solar panel cell efficiency explained, December 23, 2021 Most Efficient Solar Panels: Solar Panel Efficiency Explained | Energy Sage. |
| [24] | G. Muhammed & N. Tekbiyik-Ersoy. (2020). Development of Renewable Energy in China, USA, and Brazil: A Comparative Study on Renewable Energy Policies. Sustainability 12, 9136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219136 |
| [25] | Energysage, Most efficient solar panels: solar panel cell efficiency explained, 2020, Solar Energy in the United States | Department of Energy. |
| [26] | "First Solar Appoints James Hughes CEO". https://investor.firstsolar.com/news/press-release-details/2012/First-Solar-Appoints-James-Hughes-CEO/default.aspx. |
| [27] | https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/FSLR/first-solar/net-incomehttps://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/FSLR/financials/annual/balance-sheet |
| [28] | Michael Kanellos (November 6, 2007). "Fast-growing First Solar announces deals and plants" Green Tech – CNET News. |
| [29] | Michael Kanellos (August 6, 2011). "Suntech Abandons Thin Film, Wafer Experiments". GreenTechSolar. |
| [30] | First Solar, “Overview”, 2021, https://www.First Solar.com/About-Us/Overview |
| [31] | Joseph A. Schumpeter (1983). The theory of economic development, Harvard Economic Studies 46. |
| [32] | First Solar, “Recycling”, 2021, https://www.First Solar.com/Modules/Recycling |
| [33] | P. Drucker. (1993). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Harper Collins Publishers; J. Tidd & J. Bessant. (2009). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons. |
| [34] | https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/08/solar-plus-storage-securing-energy-reducing-geopolitical-risk/ |
| [35] | G. Johnson & K. Scholes. (2002). Exploring Corporate Strategy, Prentice Hall, Harlow; R. H. Waterman Jr., Th. J. Peters, J. R. Phillips (1980), Structure is not organization, Business Horizons 23 (3), 14-26. |
| [36] | CAPP, “World energy needs”, 2021, https://www.capp.ca/energy/world-energy-needs/ |
| [37] | UNDP, “People’s climate votes results”, January 2021, https://www.undp.org/press-releases/worlds-largest-survey-public-opinion-climate-change-majority-people-call-wide |
| [38] | First Solar, “Components and structures”, 2021, https://www.First Solar.com/Modules/Ecosystem |
| [39] | EnergyAcuity, “Top 10 largest solar companies in the US”, December 2018, https://www.energyacuity.com/blog/top-10-largest-solar-companies-in-the-u-s/ |
| [40] | First Solar, “Locations”, 2021, https://www.First Solar.com/About-Us/Locations |
| [41] | First Solar, “Leadership”, 2021, https://www.First Solar.com/About-Us/Leadership |
| [42] | First Solar, “Careers”, 2021, https://www.First Solar.com/Careers |
| [43] | Statista, “Real gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate in the United States from 2016 to 2026”, 2021, https://www.statista.com/statistics/263614/gross-domestic-product-gdp-growth-rate-in-the-united-states/ |
| [44] | David K. Ferry, Vincent R. Whiteside & Ian R. Sellers. (2022), Pathways to hot carrier solar cells, Journal of Photonics for Energy, 12 (2), 022204; doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.12.022204) |
| [45] | Ilya Chernyakhovskiy et al, (2016). “NREL, U.S. Laws and Regulations for Renewable Energy Grid Interconnections ”, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/66724.pdf |
| [46] | A. Sciullo, G. Winston Gilcrease, M. Perugini, D. Padovan, B. Curli, J. Sterling Gregg, O. Arrobbio, E. Meynaerts, S. Delvaux, L. Polo-Alvarez, C. Candelise, E. van der Waal, H. van der Windt, W. Hubert, N. Ivask & M. Muiste, (2022). Exploring Institutional and Socio-Economic Settings for the Development of Energy Communities in Europe, Energies 15 (4), 1597. |
| [47] | R. V. Percival & H. Zhao. (2014). The Role of Civil Society in Environmental Governance in the United States and China, Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 24, 142-185. |
| [48] | David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule & Hanspeter Kriesi. (2004). The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Blackwell; Ltd and https://carbonswitch.com/analysis-of-environmental-giving |
| [49] | T. Dietz, G. T. Gardner, J. Gilligan, P. C. Stern, P. & M. P. Vandenbergh. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 106 (44), 18452-18456. |
| [50] | A. Dougherty. (2021). A Student Reflects on Her US Environmental Education. In: Curriculum and Learning for Climate Action (pp. 29-34). |
| [51] | Valerie Volcovici, Solar energy can account for 40% of U.S. electricity by 2035 -DOE, September 9, 2021 https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/biden-administration-set-goal-45-solar-energy-by-2050-nyt-202109 08/ |
| [52] | https://www.energy.gov/communitysolar/community-solar |
| [53] | Surabhi Rajagopal & Kate DeAngelis, “ACCESS CSO friends of the world united states”, https://energypedia.info/wiki/ACCESS_CSO_-_Friends_of_the_Earth_United_States |
| [54] | Friends of the World international, “FAQ”, https://www.foei.org/about-foei/frequently-asked-questions |
| [55] | ActionAid USA, Friends of the world USA et al,“Fair Shares NDC sign-on letter”, April 19 2021, https://foe.org/projects/2021-priorities/ |
| [56] | https://www.solarunitedneighbors.org/about-us/our-history/detailed-history |
| [57] | https://www.touchstoneenergy.com/Pages/default.aspx |
| [58] | https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/mine-workers-union-endorses-biden-energy-policies-exchange-job-training-n1264490 |
| [59] | T. van der Schoor & B. Scholtens. (2015). Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 666-675. |
| [60] | A. de Witt, J. de Boer, N. Hedlund & P. Osseweijer. (2016). A new tool to map the major worldviews in the Netherlands and USA, and explore how they relate to climate change, Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 101-112. |
| [61] | Vanessa Taylor, “The ethics of solar power are more complicated than you think”, July 5 2021, https://www.mic.com/impact/the-ethics-of-solar-power-are-more-complicated-than-you-think-75484220 |
| [62] | Jacob Gudmundsen, “There Are Ethical Concerns Surrounding Solar Energy”, July 12 2021, https://www.mackinac.org/the-ethical-concerns-surrounding-solar-energy |
| [63] | Kelly Pickerel, “Polysilicon production already moving out of Xinjiang, but China still dominates”, August 23 2021, https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2021/08/polysilicon-production-already-moving-out-of-xinjiang-but-china-still-dominates/ |
| [64] | A. S. Christopher. (2009). Cultural constraints on wind and solar energy in the u.s. context. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 7 (3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1353/ctt.0.0046 |
| [65] | N. Komendantova, A. Patt, L. Barras & A. Battaglini. (2012). Perception of risks in renewable energy projects: The case of concentrated solar power in North Africa. Energy policy, 40, 103-109. |
| [66] | Hannah Ritchie, What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy? February 10, 2020 https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy |
| [67] | United States Department of Labour, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2019, https://www.osha.gov/green-jobs/solar |
| [68] | C. Sener & V. Fthenakis. (2014). Energy policy and financing options to achieve solar energy grid penetration targets: Accounting for external costs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 854-868. |
| [69] | M. Peters, M. Schneider, T. Griesshaber & V. H. Hoffmann. (2012). The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change–Does the locus of policies matter?. Research Policy, 41 (8), 1296-1308. |
| [70] | Richard E. Matland (1995). “Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation”. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235752963_Richard_E_Matland_1995_Synthesizing_the_Implementation_Literature_The_Ambiguity Conflict_Model_of_Policy_Implementation_Journal_of_Public_Administration_Research_and_Theory_52_145-174 |
| [71] | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Homeowner’s Guide to the Federal Tax Credit for Solar Photovoltaicshttps://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/homeowners-guide-federal-tax-credit-solar-photovoltaics |
| [72] | I. Scott. (2013). "Dancing Backward in High Heels": Examining and Addressing the Disparate Regulatory Treatment of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Resources. Environmental Law, 255-294. |
| [73] | H. Yin & N. Powers. (2010). Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generationʔ. Energy Policy, 38 (2), 1140-1149. |
| [74] | EIA, “Solar generation was 3% of U.S. electricity production in 2020, but we predict it will be 20% by 2050”, November 16, 2021, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=50357 |
| [75] | Joshua D. Rhodes, Biden’s proposed tenfold increase in solar power would remake the US electricity system, September 10, 2021 https://theconversation.com/bidens-proposed-tenfold-increase-in-solar-power-would-remake-the-us-electricity-system-167605#: |
| [76] | Margaret A. Shannon, Chapter 5, Mechanisms for Coordination, https://www.fao.org/3/Y4653E/y4653e08.htm |
| [77] | SEIA, Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC), 2020 https://www.seia.org/initiatives/solar-investment-tax-credit-itc |
| [78] | L. C. Stokes & H. L. Breetz. (2018). Politics in the US energy transition: Case studies of solar, wind, biofuels and electric vehicles policy. Energy Policy, 113, 76-86. |
| [79] | United Nation, “Climate change is the defining challenge of our age.” November 2008, https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol, https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/08_unfccc_kp_ref_manual.pdf |
| [80] | Energy.gov, Examination of Federal Financial Assistance in the Renewable Energy Market, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2018/11/f57/Examination%20of%20Federal%20Financial%20Assistance%20in%20the%20Renewable%20Energy%20Mark._1.pdf |
| [81] | Luke Tarbi, “The History and Future of the Solar ITC”, EnergySage (May 18 2015), https://news.energysage.com/the-history-and-future-of-the-solar-itc/#comments |
| [82] | Molly F. Sherlock for the congressional research service, “The Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit: In Brief”, (April 29 2020). |
| [83] | IEA, “Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)”, (14 September 2020), https://www.iea.org/policies/4837-renewable-portfolio-standard-rps |
| [84] | Robert C. Grace et al, “When Renewable Energy Policy Objectives Conflict: A Guide for Policymakers”, (October 2011). |
| [85] | SEIA, “solar industry research data”, (2021), https://www.seia.org/solar-industry-research-data |
| [86] | SEIA, “Solar Energy”, (2021), https://www.seia.org/initiatives/about-solar-energy |
| [87] | U.S. Pirg, “Report: blocking rooftop solar”, (June 17 2021), https://uspirg.org/reports/usp/blocking-rooftop-solar |
| [88] | EIA, “Annual energy outlook”, (2021), https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/ |
| [89] | Energy GOV, Power Tower System Concentrating Solar-Thermal Power Basics, 21 Jul 2018, https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/power-tower-system-concentrating-solar-thermal-power-basics |
| [90] | P. Meyers, First Solar Polycrystalline CdTe Thin Film PV, 7 May 2006, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/First-Solar-Polycrystalline-CdTe-Thin-Film-PV-Meyers/666e53abb5973a2acf22a2c548ab21ea596dd5b1 |
| [91] | Jariel Arvin, Two-thirds of the world’s population think climate change is an emergency, https://www.vox.com/22254779/climate-change-un-emergency-world |
| [92] | B. K. Sovacool, R. Andersen, S. Sorensen, K. Sorensen, V. Tienda, A. Vainorius & F. Bjørn-Thygesen. (2016). Balancing safety with sustainability: assessing the risk of accidents for modern low-carbon energy systems. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 3952-3965. |
| [93] | Tracy Fosterling, Step-down of Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for Solar + Storage projects, Jul 08, 2019, https://www.energytoolbase.com/newsroom/blog/solar-investment-tax-credit-step-down |
APA Style
Ali Aqlan, Henny van der Windt. (2023). Solar Power Technologies Growth in the United States, an Integrated Four Pillars Perspective. American Journal of Modern Energy, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11
ACS Style
Ali Aqlan; Henny van der Windt. Solar Power Technologies Growth in the United States, an Integrated Four Pillars Perspective. Am. J. Mod. Energy 2023, 9(1), 1-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11
AMA Style
Ali Aqlan, Henny van der Windt. Solar Power Technologies Growth in the United States, an Integrated Four Pillars Perspective. Am J Mod Energy. 2023;9(1):1-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11,
author = {Ali Aqlan and Henny van der Windt},
title = {Solar Power Technologies Growth in the United States, an Integrated Four Pillars Perspective},
journal = {American Journal of Modern Energy},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {1-16},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajme.20230901.11},
abstract = {This paper examines solar power technologies growth in the United States (U.S.) considering the four pillars of the energy system: socio-cultural, policy, science & technology, and markets & companies. The study analyzed the growing use of Photovoltaic panels (PV) technology. The First Solar company was analyzed as a case study to understand the impact of the different energy pillars and challenges on PV technology in the U.S. As a general observation, it was found that solar power in the U.S. is an incredibly fast-growing technology. Solar power does however still only make up a relatively small fraction of the total power consumption in the U.S. - in 2020 of approximately 1.32%. Considering these two observations, solar power in the U.S. is currently in the middle of being a niche-technology and forming its own energy regime. The possibilities for solar power to grow further into a solid regime in the U.S. are supported by developments concerning the four pillars of the energy system. For the science and technology pillar we will focus on main technological developments and R&D. The markets-companies pillar will be discussed by considering the characteristics of main company First Solar and market developments. The social and cultural pillar will be explored by looking at the role of citizens, NGOs, and relevant cultural perspectives. For the policy pillar, we will focus on federal policy, some main policy instruments and implementation problems. Eventually this study explores two different scenarios of solar energy in the U.S: a business-as-usual scenario and a maximally optimistic scenario. In the first scenario solar power production will increase to about 5% by 2031 of the total power demand in the U.S. In the optimistic scenario it will be around 17% of the total power production in the U.S, an increase by a factor 3.4, depending on developments in the four pillars.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Solar Power Technologies Growth in the United States, an Integrated Four Pillars Perspective AU - Ali Aqlan AU - Henny van der Windt Y1 - 2023/03/20 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11 T2 - American Journal of Modern Energy JF - American Journal of Modern Energy JO - American Journal of Modern Energy SP - 1 EP - 16 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3797 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20230901.11 AB - This paper examines solar power technologies growth in the United States (U.S.) considering the four pillars of the energy system: socio-cultural, policy, science & technology, and markets & companies. The study analyzed the growing use of Photovoltaic panels (PV) technology. The First Solar company was analyzed as a case study to understand the impact of the different energy pillars and challenges on PV technology in the U.S. As a general observation, it was found that solar power in the U.S. is an incredibly fast-growing technology. Solar power does however still only make up a relatively small fraction of the total power consumption in the U.S. - in 2020 of approximately 1.32%. Considering these two observations, solar power in the U.S. is currently in the middle of being a niche-technology and forming its own energy regime. The possibilities for solar power to grow further into a solid regime in the U.S. are supported by developments concerning the four pillars of the energy system. For the science and technology pillar we will focus on main technological developments and R&D. The markets-companies pillar will be discussed by considering the characteristics of main company First Solar and market developments. The social and cultural pillar will be explored by looking at the role of citizens, NGOs, and relevant cultural perspectives. For the policy pillar, we will focus on federal policy, some main policy instruments and implementation problems. Eventually this study explores two different scenarios of solar energy in the U.S: a business-as-usual scenario and a maximally optimistic scenario. In the first scenario solar power production will increase to about 5% by 2031 of the total power demand in the U.S. In the optimistic scenario it will be around 17% of the total power production in the U.S, an increase by a factor 3.4, depending on developments in the four pillars. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: