The fusiform face area, or FFA, is a small region found on the inferior (bottom) surface of the temporal lobe. It is located in a gyrus called the fusiform gyrus.Studies in humans have shown that the FFA is sensitive to both face parts and face configurations. Recoding activity in the FFA showed that most of the neurons in the FFA are active in response to facial imagery, but not in response to images of other body parts or objects. Visual sensory neurons sensitive to a face feature and possessing a related firing rate activate an associated cluster of neurons in the FFA. This results in a partition of the FFA into clusters that respond to the various facial features. Once an entire face stimulus activates the FFA, interneurons redistribute the initial activation via the neural network. In this article a novel approach to modelling the function of the network is presented. We define by a transition matrix that describes probabilistically how one cluster, firing at a synchronous rate, affects the others in the FFA. The initial face stimulation in the FFA together with the transition matrix defines a dynamical system which possesses a stationary probability function. We claim that a stationary probability function uniquely represents a face. Among the properties of this probability function are: 1) response magnitude invariance, 2) repurposing of clusters to define new stationary probability function on the FFA partition; 3) stability of stationary probabilities under perturbations.
Published in | American Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13 |
Page(s) | 76-80 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Dynamical Systems, Model for Face Perception, Fusiform Face Area (FFA), Face Parts, Stationary Measure, Stability
[1] | Abeles, M., Corticonics: Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex, Cambridge University Press, 1991. |
[2] | Al-A ` meri, J. H. and Saber, S. M., “IFS code as features in face recognition system,” Int. J. Modern Trends in Engineering and Research, Vol. 03, Issue 08, August 2016. |
[3] | Bertolero, M. and Bassett D. S., “How matter becomes mind,” Sci. Am., July 2019, 26–33. |
[4] | Boyarsky, A., “Mind: Probability functions on matter,” International Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 2015, 4 (1): 1–2. |
[5] | Boyarsky, A. and Góra, P., “Invariant measures in brain dynamics,” Physics Letters A, 358, 2000, 27–30. |
[6] | Boyarsky, Abraham; Góra, Paweł; Laws of chaos. Invariant measures and dynamical systems in one dimension, Probability and its Applications. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1997. |
[7] | Boyarsky, Abraham; Góra, Paweł“A matrix solution to the inverse Perron-Frobenius problem,” Proceedings of American Mathematical Society 118 (1993), 409–414. |
[8] | Chang, Le and Tsao, D. Y., “The code for facial identity in the primate brain,” Cell 169, (June 2017), 1013–1028. |
[9] | Herrington J. D., Taylor, J. M., Grupe, D. W., Curby, K. M. and Schultz, R. T., “Bidirectional communication between amygdala and fusiform gyrus during facial recognition,” Neuroimage, (2002) June 15; 56 (4); 2348– 2355. |
[10] | Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., McCarthy, G., (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sunderland, Mass., Sinauer Associates Publishers. |
[11] | Kanwisher, N., “Neural events and perceptual awareness,” Cognition, 79 (2001) 89-113. |
[12] | Kanwisher, N., “What‘s in a face?” Neuroscience, SCIENCE, Vol. 311, 3 February (2006), 617-618. |
[13] | Kanwisher, N. and Yovel, G., “The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces,” Phil. Trans. of the Royal Society B (2006) 361, 2109– 2128. |
[14] | Kemeny, John G. and Snell, J. Laurie, Finite Markov chains. Reprinting of the 1960 original. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York- Heidelberg, 1976. |
[15] | Klinshov, V. V., Teramae, J., Nekorkin, V. I., and Fukai, T., “Dense neuron clustering explains connectivity statistics in cortical microcircuits,” PloS ONE 9 (4): e94292 (2014). |
[16] | Liu, J., Harrison, A. and Kanwisher, N., “Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: An fMRI Study,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 1, 203-211, 2009. |
[17] | Nestor, A., Plaut, D. C. and Behrmann, M., “Unraveling the distributed neural code of face identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis,” PNAS, June 14, (2011), vol. 108, no. 24, 10003. |
[18] | Nichols, D. F., Both, L. R. and Wilson, H. R., “Decoding of faces and face components in face-sensitive human visual cortex,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 1, article 28, July 2010. |
[19] | O‘Craven, K. M. and Kanwisher, N., “Mental imagery of faces and places activate corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions,” Journal of cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 6 1013–1023, 2000. |
[20] | Quiroga, R. Q., Fried, I. and Koch C., “Brain cells of Grandmother,” Scientific American, February 2013. |
[21] | Stollhoff, R., Kennerknecht, I., Elze, T. and Jost, J., “A computational model of dysfunctional facial encoding in congenital prosopagnosia,” Neural Networks 24, 652– 664, 2011. |
[22] | Wandell, B. A, Brewer, A. A and Doughherty, “Visual field map clusters in human cortex,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci, (2005), April 29 360 (1456), 693–707. |
[23] | Yovel, G. and Kanwisher, N., “The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect.” Current Biology, Vol. 15 (2005), 2256–2262. |
APA Style
Abraham Boyarsky, Paweł Góra. (2021). A Dynamical Systems Model for Face Perception. American Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 6(4), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13
ACS Style
Abraham Boyarsky; Paweł Góra. A Dynamical Systems Model for Face Perception. Am. J. Math. Comput. Model. 2021, 6(4), 76-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13
AMA Style
Abraham Boyarsky, Paweł Góra. A Dynamical Systems Model for Face Perception. Am J Math Comput Model. 2021;6(4):76-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13, author = {Abraham Boyarsky and Paweł Góra}, title = {A Dynamical Systems Model for Face Perception}, journal = {American Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling}, volume = {6}, number = {4}, pages = {76-80}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmcm.20210604.13}, abstract = {The fusiform face area, or FFA, is a small region found on the inferior (bottom) surface of the temporal lobe. It is located in a gyrus called the fusiform gyrus.Studies in humans have shown that the FFA is sensitive to both face parts and face configurations. Recoding activity in the FFA showed that most of the neurons in the FFA are active in response to facial imagery, but not in response to images of other body parts or objects. Visual sensory neurons sensitive to a face feature and possessing a related firing rate activate an associated cluster of neurons in the FFA. This results in a partition of the FFA into clusters that respond to the various facial features. Once an entire face stimulus activates the FFA, interneurons redistribute the initial activation via the neural network. In this article a novel approach to modelling the function of the network is presented. We define by a transition matrix that describes probabilistically how one cluster, firing at a synchronous rate, affects the others in the FFA. The initial face stimulation in the FFA together with the transition matrix defines a dynamical system which possesses a stationary probability function. We claim that a stationary probability function uniquely represents a face. Among the properties of this probability function are: 1) response magnitude invariance, 2) repurposing of clusters to define new stationary probability function on the FFA partition; 3) stability of stationary probabilities under perturbations.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Dynamical Systems Model for Face Perception AU - Abraham Boyarsky AU - Paweł Góra Y1 - 2021/12/24 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13 T2 - American Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling JF - American Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling JO - American Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling SP - 76 EP - 80 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8280 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmcm.20210604.13 AB - The fusiform face area, or FFA, is a small region found on the inferior (bottom) surface of the temporal lobe. It is located in a gyrus called the fusiform gyrus.Studies in humans have shown that the FFA is sensitive to both face parts and face configurations. Recoding activity in the FFA showed that most of the neurons in the FFA are active in response to facial imagery, but not in response to images of other body parts or objects. Visual sensory neurons sensitive to a face feature and possessing a related firing rate activate an associated cluster of neurons in the FFA. This results in a partition of the FFA into clusters that respond to the various facial features. Once an entire face stimulus activates the FFA, interneurons redistribute the initial activation via the neural network. In this article a novel approach to modelling the function of the network is presented. We define by a transition matrix that describes probabilistically how one cluster, firing at a synchronous rate, affects the others in the FFA. The initial face stimulation in the FFA together with the transition matrix defines a dynamical system which possesses a stationary probability function. We claim that a stationary probability function uniquely represents a face. Among the properties of this probability function are: 1) response magnitude invariance, 2) repurposing of clusters to define new stationary probability function on the FFA partition; 3) stability of stationary probabilities under perturbations. VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -