| Peer-Reviewed

Instrumental Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Cucumber Fruit as Influenced by Its Part and Maturity Stage

Received: 15 September 2018     Accepted: 27 September 2018     Published: 24 October 2018
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) of Nandini cucumber fruit, was measured as a function of its parts (stalk, mid and blossom), and maturity stages. These textural parameters; hardness, springiness, adhesiveness, gumminess, stringiness, fracturability, and chewiness of the fruit were measured; over a course of four maturity stages, 6, 9, 12 and 15 Days after Peak Anthesis (DAPA). The texture profile analysis was done by using the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) method, and the results showed that maturity stage and fruit part significantly (P ≤ 0.05) influenced all the textural parameters evaluated. Over the course of maturation, all the parameters investigated were found to increase. During maturation, the stalk, mid and blossom hardness increased by 25, 26 and 32% respectively; springiness increased by 6.4, 7.7 and 6.2 % in the stalk, mid and blossom; gumminess increased by 57.7, 57.4 and 42.2% in the stalk, mid and blossom; chewiness increased by 60.5, 63.1 and 47% in the stalk, mid and blossom; fracturability increased from 89.13 to 118.29, 82.76 to 110.7 and 62.28 to 90.12 N in the stalk, mid and blossom; adhesiveness increased from 9.14 to 13.2, 8.49 to 12.27 and 7.15 to 9.83 Ns in the stalk, mid and blossom; lastly, stringiness increased from 20.05 to 21.61, 19.46 to 20.81 and 19.06 to 19.79 mm in the stalk, mid and blossom. The results showed significant correlation of all the parameters investigated with maturation and fruit part.

Published in American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (Volume 3, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11
Page(s) 54-60
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Texture Profile Analysis, Cucumber Fruit, Maturity Stage

References
[1] Ullah, M. Z., Hassan, M. J., Chowdhury, A. Z. M. K. A, Saki, A. I. and Rahman, A. H. M. A. (2012). Genetic variability and correlation in exotic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) varieties. Bangladesh Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 25(1):17-23.
[2] Eboibi, O. and Uguru, H. (2017). Storage conditions effect on physical, mechanical and textural properties of intact cucumber (cv Nandini). International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research. Volume-7, Pp 48-56
[3] Eboibi, O. and Uguru, H. (2018). Effect of Moisture Content on the Mechanical Properties of Cucumber Fruit. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, pp 671–678.
[4] Nema, N. K., Maity, N., Sarkar, B. and Mukherjee, P. K. (2011). Cucumis sativus fruit potential antioxidant, anti-hyaluronidase, and anti-elastase agent. Archives of Dermatological Research 303:247-52.
[5] Soni, R. (2017). “8 Amazing Health Benefits of Cucumber Seeds.” Downloaded from https://www.homesogood.com/8-amazing-health-benefits-of-cucumber-seeds/ downloaded on 24th August, 2017
[6] Bourne M. C. (1980). Texture evaluation of horticultural crops. Hort. Sci., 15, 51-56.
[7] Szczesniak, A. S. (1963). Classification of Textural Characteristics. Journal of Food Science 28.4
[8] Chen, L. and Opara, U. L. (2013). Texture measurement approaches in fresh and processed foods — A review. Food Research International Vol 51 (2): pp 823-835.
[9] Klima, J. L., Malladi, A., Scott, N. D. (2011). Differences in cell number facilitate fruit size variation in Rabbit eye blueberry genotypes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 136, 10–15.
[10] Costa, F., Cappellin, L., Longhi, S., Guerra, W., Magnano, P., Porro, D., Soukoulis, C., Salvi, S., Velasco, R., Biasioli, F., Gasperi, F. (2011). Assessment of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit texture by a combined acoustic-mechanical profiling strategy. Postharvest Biology and Technology 6, 21–28.
[11] Giongo, L., Poncetta, P., Loretti, P., Costa, F., 2013. Texture profiling of blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) during fruit development, ripening and storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 76 (2013) 34–39.
[12] Alamar, M. C., Vanstreels, E., Oey, M. L., Moltó, E. and Nicolaï, B. M. (2008) Micromechanical behaviour of apple tissue in tensile and compression tests: Storage conditions and cultivar effect. Journal of Food Engineering. 86 (3), 324–333.
[13] Szczesniak A. S., 1998. Effect of storage on texture. In: Food Storage stability (Eds I. A. Taub, R. P. Singh). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
[14] Myhara R. M., Al-Alawi A., Karkalas J. and Taylor M. S. (2000) Sensory and textural changes in maturating Omani dates. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80, pp. 2181–2185.
[15] Guiné, R. P. F., Andrade, S. Correia, A. C., Jordão, A. M., Lopes, A. D. and Ferreira, D. (2011). Evaluation of textural properties in apples of regional varieties. International Journal of Food Properties. 14, (2): 331-338.
[16] Paoletti, F., Moneta, E., Bertone, A. and Sinesio, F. (1993). Mechanical Properties and sensory evaluation of selected apple cultivars. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie (LWT), 26 (3), 264–270.
[17] Mavroudis, N. E., Dejmek, P. and Sjoholm, I. (2004). Studies on some raw material characteristics in different Swedish apple varieties. Journal of Food Engineering. 121–129.
[18] Steffe, J. F. (1996). Rheological Methods in Food Process Engineering. (Second Edition). Freeman Press, USA. Pp 72-90.
[19] Karaj, S. and Muller, J. (2010). Determination of physical, mechanical and chemical properties of seeds and kernels of Jatropha curcas L. Ind. Crop Prod. 32, 129–138.
[20] Brennan, J. G., Jowitt, R. and Mohamed, A. M. A. (1977). Instrumental measurement of fruit texture: a study on apples. Ann. Appl. Biol. 87:121-127.
[21] Abdullah, M. A., Hussain M. S., Diaeldein, O. A. and Mahmoud, A. Y. (2014). Texture profile analysis of date flesh for some Saudi date cultivars. International Journal of General Engineering and Technology. Vol. 3 (3): 1-10.
[22] Nadeem, M., Salim-Rehman, Anjum, F. M., Bhatti, I. A. (2011). Quality evaluation of some Pakistani date varieties, Pakistan. J. Agric. Sci. 48, 305–313.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Oderhowho Nyorere, Hilary Uguru. (2018). Instrumental Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Cucumber Fruit as Influenced by Its Part and Maturity Stage. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 3(4), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Oderhowho Nyorere; Hilary Uguru. Instrumental Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Cucumber Fruit as Influenced by Its Part and Maturity Stage. Am. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2018, 3(4), 54-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Oderhowho Nyorere, Hilary Uguru. Instrumental Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Cucumber Fruit as Influenced by Its Part and Maturity Stage. Am J Eng Technol Manag. 2018;3(4):54-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11,
      author = {Oderhowho Nyorere and Hilary Uguru},
      title = {Instrumental Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Cucumber Fruit as Influenced by Its Part and Maturity Stage},
      journal = {American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management},
      volume = {3},
      number = {4},
      pages = {54-60},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajetm.20180304.11},
      abstract = {Instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) of Nandini cucumber fruit, was measured as a function of its parts (stalk, mid and blossom), and maturity stages. These textural parameters; hardness, springiness, adhesiveness, gumminess, stringiness, fracturability, and chewiness of the fruit were measured; over a course of four maturity stages, 6, 9, 12 and 15 Days after Peak Anthesis (DAPA). The texture profile analysis was done by using the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) method, and the results showed that maturity stage and fruit part significantly (P ≤ 0.05) influenced all the textural parameters evaluated. Over the course of maturation, all the parameters investigated were found to increase. During maturation, the stalk, mid and blossom hardness increased by 25, 26 and 32% respectively; springiness increased by 6.4, 7.7 and 6.2 % in the stalk, mid and blossom; gumminess increased by 57.7, 57.4 and 42.2% in the stalk, mid and blossom; chewiness increased by 60.5, 63.1 and 47% in the stalk, mid and blossom; fracturability increased from 89.13 to 118.29, 82.76 to 110.7 and 62.28 to 90.12 N in the stalk, mid and blossom; adhesiveness increased from 9.14 to 13.2, 8.49 to 12.27 and 7.15 to 9.83 Ns in the stalk, mid and blossom; lastly, stringiness increased from 20.05 to 21.61, 19.46 to 20.81 and 19.06 to 19.79 mm in the stalk, mid and blossom. The results showed significant correlation of all the parameters investigated with maturation and fruit part.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Instrumental Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Cucumber Fruit as Influenced by Its Part and Maturity Stage
    AU  - Oderhowho Nyorere
    AU  - Hilary Uguru
    Y1  - 2018/10/24
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11
    T2  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    JF  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    JO  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    SP  - 54
    EP  - 60
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1441
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20180304.11
    AB  - Instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) of Nandini cucumber fruit, was measured as a function of its parts (stalk, mid and blossom), and maturity stages. These textural parameters; hardness, springiness, adhesiveness, gumminess, stringiness, fracturability, and chewiness of the fruit were measured; over a course of four maturity stages, 6, 9, 12 and 15 Days after Peak Anthesis (DAPA). The texture profile analysis was done by using the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) method, and the results showed that maturity stage and fruit part significantly (P ≤ 0.05) influenced all the textural parameters evaluated. Over the course of maturation, all the parameters investigated were found to increase. During maturation, the stalk, mid and blossom hardness increased by 25, 26 and 32% respectively; springiness increased by 6.4, 7.7 and 6.2 % in the stalk, mid and blossom; gumminess increased by 57.7, 57.4 and 42.2% in the stalk, mid and blossom; chewiness increased by 60.5, 63.1 and 47% in the stalk, mid and blossom; fracturability increased from 89.13 to 118.29, 82.76 to 110.7 and 62.28 to 90.12 N in the stalk, mid and blossom; adhesiveness increased from 9.14 to 13.2, 8.49 to 12.27 and 7.15 to 9.83 Ns in the stalk, mid and blossom; lastly, stringiness increased from 20.05 to 21.61, 19.46 to 20.81 and 19.06 to 19.79 mm in the stalk, mid and blossom. The results showed significant correlation of all the parameters investigated with maturation and fruit part.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Agricultural and Bio-Environmental Engineering Technology Department, School of Engineering, Delta State Polytechnic, Ozoro, Nigeria

  • Agricultural and Bio-Environmental Engineering Technology Department, School of Engineering, Delta State Polytechnic, Ozoro, Nigeria

  • Sections