This commentary was written as part of a travel symposium organized by the Calotte Academy between Finland, Russia, and Norway entitled “Resilience Related to Sustainable Development in Globalization” which occurred from the period of May 30 to June 5, 2016. The focus is in particular on environmental perspectives towards industrial mining and nature protection at community level. As the socio-economic and political systems of communities evolve in time and space through globalization, the challenge remains for humans to meet the needs of present without compromising the ability of future generations. One of the crucial examples in today’s world includes locating industrial mines near protected areas. In general, this raises concerns of endangering ecological landscapes and undermining human needs. However, there are possibilities for sustainable development to the immediate community. For instance, by means of employment in the mining sector incorporated with the establishment of sustainable environmental management schemes. Using a method approach of document review, a case study of Hannukainen mine near Pallas-Yllas National Park in Finnish Lapland is analyzed. This paper responds to the 2013 Environmental Impact Assessment report by Northland Mines Oy which planned to re-open mining operations in 2016 but faced resistance. Both problems and benefits posed by mining to the human and natural environment are highlighted including human reactions to such problems. It then concludes by proposing possible implications for sustainable development at community level.
Published in | American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13 |
Page(s) | 48-51 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Protected Area, Sustainable Development, Industrial Mining
[1] | Abubakar, M. M., Ahmed, M. M., and Getso, B. U. (2014) Rhizofiltration of Heavy Metals from Eutrophic Water Using Pistia Stratiotes in a Controlled Environment. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, Vol. 8 (6), 1-3. |
[2] | Carrozzino, A. L., Stauffer, D. F., Haas, C. F., Zipper, C. E. (2011) Enhancing Wildlife Habitat on Reclaimed Minelands. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/54954 |
[3] | GTK (2015) Metals and Minerals Production. Geological Survey of Finland- GTK. Retrieved from: http://en.gtk.fi/informationservices/mineralproduction/ |
[4] | Haataja, A. (2014) An adventure in the Arctic. Retrieved from https://anttihaataja.wordpress.com/2014/03/23/2325/#comment-421 |
[5] | Lambert, M., Leven, B. A., Greent, R. M. (2003) New Methods of Cleaning Up Heavy Metals in Soils and Water. Env. Science and Tech. Briefs for Citizens. Kansas State University. Retrieved from www.engg.ksu..edu/HSRC/Tosc/metals.pdf |
[6] | Lunney, A. I., Zeeb, B. A., and Reimer, K. J. (2004) Uptake of Weathered DDT in Vascular Plants: Potential for Phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 38 (22), 6147-6154. |
[7] | Mainio, T., and Teivainen, A. (2014) Mine plan stirs anxiety in Lapland. Helsinki Times. Retrieved from http://www.helsinkitimes.fi/finland/finland-news/domestic/9926-mine-plan-stirs-anxiety-in-lapland.html |
[8] | MMSD (2002) Breaking New Ground. The Report of the Mining, Minerals, and Sustainable Development Project. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London. Retrieved from oldwww.wbcsd.org/DocRoot/ev8jEJvTiMYd4mJhGGHQ/finalmmsdreport.pdf |
[9] | Northland Mines Oy (2013) The Environmental Impact Assessment report of Hannukainen Iron Mine. Retrieved from https://www.naturvardsverket.se/upload/stod-i-miljoarbetet/remisser-och-yttranden/tidigare/remisser-2013/finsk-gruva-kan-paverka-gransalv-till-sverige/hannukainen-hydrological-impact-assessment-eng-2013.pdf |
[10] | Regional Council of Lapland (2013) Lapland in figures 2012‒2013. Retrieved from http://www.lapinliitto.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=156815&name=DLFE-16895.pdf |
[11] | Suopajarvi, L. (2015) The right to mine? Discourse analysis of social impact assessments of mining projects in Finnish Lapland in the 2000s. BARENTS STUDIES: Peoples, Economies and Politics VOL. 1 (3), 37-53. |
APA Style
Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu. (2017). Rethinking the Coexistence of Industrial Mining Near Protected Areas: Human Concerns for Sustainable Development in the Arctic. American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 1(2), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13
ACS Style
Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu. Rethinking the Coexistence of Industrial Mining Near Protected Areas: Human Concerns for Sustainable Development in the Arctic. Am. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2017, 1(2), 48-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13, author = {Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu}, title = {Rethinking the Coexistence of Industrial Mining Near Protected Areas: Human Concerns for Sustainable Development in the Arctic}, journal = {American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, pages = {48-51}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajese.20170102.13}, abstract = {This commentary was written as part of a travel symposium organized by the Calotte Academy between Finland, Russia, and Norway entitled “Resilience Related to Sustainable Development in Globalization” which occurred from the period of May 30 to June 5, 2016. The focus is in particular on environmental perspectives towards industrial mining and nature protection at community level. As the socio-economic and political systems of communities evolve in time and space through globalization, the challenge remains for humans to meet the needs of present without compromising the ability of future generations. One of the crucial examples in today’s world includes locating industrial mines near protected areas. In general, this raises concerns of endangering ecological landscapes and undermining human needs. However, there are possibilities for sustainable development to the immediate community. For instance, by means of employment in the mining sector incorporated with the establishment of sustainable environmental management schemes. Using a method approach of document review, a case study of Hannukainen mine near Pallas-Yllas National Park in Finnish Lapland is analyzed. This paper responds to the 2013 Environmental Impact Assessment report by Northland Mines Oy which planned to re-open mining operations in 2016 but faced resistance. Both problems and benefits posed by mining to the human and natural environment are highlighted including human reactions to such problems. It then concludes by proposing possible implications for sustainable development at community level.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Rethinking the Coexistence of Industrial Mining Near Protected Areas: Human Concerns for Sustainable Development in the Arctic AU - Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu Y1 - 2017/04/15 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13 T2 - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering JF - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering JO - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering SP - 48 EP - 51 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-7993 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170102.13 AB - This commentary was written as part of a travel symposium organized by the Calotte Academy between Finland, Russia, and Norway entitled “Resilience Related to Sustainable Development in Globalization” which occurred from the period of May 30 to June 5, 2016. The focus is in particular on environmental perspectives towards industrial mining and nature protection at community level. As the socio-economic and political systems of communities evolve in time and space through globalization, the challenge remains for humans to meet the needs of present without compromising the ability of future generations. One of the crucial examples in today’s world includes locating industrial mines near protected areas. In general, this raises concerns of endangering ecological landscapes and undermining human needs. However, there are possibilities for sustainable development to the immediate community. For instance, by means of employment in the mining sector incorporated with the establishment of sustainable environmental management schemes. Using a method approach of document review, a case study of Hannukainen mine near Pallas-Yllas National Park in Finnish Lapland is analyzed. This paper responds to the 2013 Environmental Impact Assessment report by Northland Mines Oy which planned to re-open mining operations in 2016 but faced resistance. Both problems and benefits posed by mining to the human and natural environment are highlighted including human reactions to such problems. It then concludes by proposing possible implications for sustainable development at community level. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -