This paper evaluates partial deposition of Caulobacter and its rate of transport in soil and water environment. The study monitored the migration process in homogeneous gravel formation. The study area predominantly deposits homogeneous gravel formation where it partially deposits Caulobacter in sequence through the lithology to phreatic bed within a short period. The rate of transport has not been monitored to determined there rate of porosity through hydraulic conductivity influences, these condition were found to pressured the contaminant fast to Phreatic bed in the study location, the transport process were integrated in the developed system that generated derived model to predict the transport process to unconfined bed. The developed model expresses various rate of concentration through simulation were partial deposition of Caulobacter in fluctuation were observed, Such theoretical values were compared with other experimental results for model validation; both parameters compared faviourably well expressing validation rate for the study, experts will definitely use these tools in monitoring the transport rate of Caulobacter in gravel formation.
Published in | American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15 |
Page(s) | 26-33 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hydraulic Conductivity, Permeability, Caulobacter and Gravel Formation
[1] | Gans, J., Wolinsky, M., and Dunbar, J. (2005). Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309, 1387–1390. |
[2] | Zhou, J., Xia, B., Treves, D. S., Wu, L. Y., Marsh, T. L., O’Neill, R. V., Palumbo, A. V., and Tiedje, J. M (2002). Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 326– 334. |
[3] | Tringe, S. G., Von Mering, C., Kobayashi, A., Salamov, A. A., Chen, K., Chang, H. W., Podar, M., Short, J. M, Mathur, E. J., Detter, J. C., Bork, P., Hugenholtz, P., and Rubin, E. M. (2005). Comparative metagenomicsof microbial communities. Science 308, 554–557. |
[4] | Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A., and Jackson, R. B. (2007a). Toward and ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88, 1354–1364. |
[5] | Papke, R. T., and Ward, D. M. (2004). The importance of physical isolation to microbial diversification. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 48, 293–303 Papke, R. T., and Ward, D. M. (2004). The importance of physical isolation to microbial diversification. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 48, 293–303 |
[6] | Wilson, M., and Lindow, S. E. (1994). Coexistence among epiphytic bacterialpopulations mediated through nutritional resource partitioning. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 4468–4477. |
[7] | Enquist BJ, Economo EP, Huxman TE, Allen AP, Ignace DD, Gillooly JF (2003) Scaling metabolism from organisms to ecosystems. Nature 423: 639–642. doi: 10.1038/nature 01671 |
[8] | Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48: 115–146. doi: 10.1023/A:1006244819642 |
[9] | Meir P, Cox P, Grace J (2006) The influence of terrestrial ecosystems on climate. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.005 |
[10] | Pfeiffer T, Bonhoeffer S (2004) Evolution of cross-feeding in microbial populations. Am Nat 163: E126–E135 doi: 10.1086/383593 |
[11] | Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S (2001) Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science 292: 504–507. doi: 10.1126/science.1058079 |
[12] | Torsvik V, Ovreas L (2002) Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 5: 240–245. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7 |
[13] | Kreft JU (2004) Biofilms promote altruism. Microbiology 150: 2751–2760. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26829-0 |
[14] | Kreft JU, Bonhoeffer S (2005) The evolution of groups of cooperating bacteria and the growth rate versus yield trade-off. Microbiology 151: 637–641. doi: 10.1099/mic.0. 27415-0 |
[15] | David A. Lipson E Russel K. Monson Æ Steven K. Schmidt E Michael N. Weintraub 2008; The trade-off between growth rate and yield in microbial communities and the consequences for under-snow soil respiration in ahigh elevation coniferous forest Biochemistry Springer Science+Business Media |
[16] | Katherine C. Goldfarb, Ulas Karaoz, China A. Hanson, Clark A. Santee, Mark A. Bradford, Kathleen K. Treseder, Matthew D. Wallenstein and Eoin L. Brodie 2011 Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance fronter in microbiology original research article |
[17] | Eluozo, S. N. Nwaoburu A. O mathematical model to monitor the deposition of void ratio and dispersion of phosphorus influence in salmonella growth rate in coarse and gravel formation in Borikiri, Rivers state of Nigeria |
[18] | Eluozo S. N. (2013) Modeling the behaviour of fluid pressure influenced by velocity and mass solute fraction in porous medium, rivers state of Nigeria International Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environment Vol. 1, No. 8, September, PP: 167 -175 |
[19] | Eluozo S. N. 2014 Predicting the transport and dispersivity rate of lactobacillus on lateritic and silty soil formation in Obioakpor metropolis Niger delta of Nigeria World Journal of Physical and Analytical Sciences Vol. 1, No. 1, October 2014, pp. 1 -7 |
[20] | Jenneman GE, McInerney MJ, Knapp RM. 1985. Microbial penetration through nutrient-saturated berea sandstone. Applied and Environ Microbiol 50: 383–391. |
[21] | Lappan RE, Fogler HS. 1992. Effect of bacterial polysaccharide production in formation damage. SPE Prod Eng 7: 167–171. |
[22] | Lappan RE, Fogler HS. 1994. Leuconostocmesenteroides growth kinetics with application to bacterial profile modification. Biotechnol Bioeng 43: 865–873. |
[23] | Vandevivere P, Baveye P. 1992. Saturated hydraulic conductivity reduction caused by aerobic bacteria in sand columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 1–13. |
[24] | Sarkar AK, Georgiou G, Sharma MM. 1994. Transport of bacteria in porous media: I. An experimental investigation. Biotechnol Bioeng 44: 489–497. |
[25] | Barry F. Wolf, H. Scott 2001 Fogler Alteration of the Growth Rate and Lag Time of Leuconostocmesenteroides NRRL-B523 biotechnology and bioengineering, vol. 72, no. 6, march 20, |
[26] | Eluozo S. N. 2013 predictive model to monitor the dispersion of chromium and streptococci influenced by porosity and velocity in silty and fine sand formation in coastal area of Amadi-Ama, Rivers state of Nigeria Research Open Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences Vol. 1, No. 1, November 2013, PP: 16 -25. |
APA Style
Eluozo S. N. (2017). Hydraulic Conductivity and Velocity Influences on Partial Deposition of Caulobacter in Homogeneous Gravel Formation, Eleme, River State of Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 1(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15
ACS Style
Eluozo S. N. Hydraulic Conductivity and Velocity Influences on Partial Deposition of Caulobacter in Homogeneous Gravel Formation, Eleme, River State of Nigeria. Am. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2017, 1(1), 26-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15, author = {Eluozo S. N.}, title = {Hydraulic Conductivity and Velocity Influences on Partial Deposition of Caulobacter in Homogeneous Gravel Formation, Eleme, River State of Nigeria}, journal = {American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {26-33}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajese.20170101.15}, abstract = {This paper evaluates partial deposition of Caulobacter and its rate of transport in soil and water environment. The study monitored the migration process in homogeneous gravel formation. The study area predominantly deposits homogeneous gravel formation where it partially deposits Caulobacter in sequence through the lithology to phreatic bed within a short period. The rate of transport has not been monitored to determined there rate of porosity through hydraulic conductivity influences, these condition were found to pressured the contaminant fast to Phreatic bed in the study location, the transport process were integrated in the developed system that generated derived model to predict the transport process to unconfined bed. The developed model expresses various rate of concentration through simulation were partial deposition of Caulobacter in fluctuation were observed, Such theoretical values were compared with other experimental results for model validation; both parameters compared faviourably well expressing validation rate for the study, experts will definitely use these tools in monitoring the transport rate of Caulobacter in gravel formation.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Hydraulic Conductivity and Velocity Influences on Partial Deposition of Caulobacter in Homogeneous Gravel Formation, Eleme, River State of Nigeria AU - Eluozo S. N. Y1 - 2017/03/31 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15 T2 - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering JF - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering JO - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering SP - 26 EP - 33 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-7993 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20170101.15 AB - This paper evaluates partial deposition of Caulobacter and its rate of transport in soil and water environment. The study monitored the migration process in homogeneous gravel formation. The study area predominantly deposits homogeneous gravel formation where it partially deposits Caulobacter in sequence through the lithology to phreatic bed within a short period. The rate of transport has not been monitored to determined there rate of porosity through hydraulic conductivity influences, these condition were found to pressured the contaminant fast to Phreatic bed in the study location, the transport process were integrated in the developed system that generated derived model to predict the transport process to unconfined bed. The developed model expresses various rate of concentration through simulation were partial deposition of Caulobacter in fluctuation were observed, Such theoretical values were compared with other experimental results for model validation; both parameters compared faviourably well expressing validation rate for the study, experts will definitely use these tools in monitoring the transport rate of Caulobacter in gravel formation. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -