Background: A regional nerve block is a type of anesthesia in which local anesthetic medications are injected near a nerve to prevent nerve impulse transmission. Recording what a professional does is one of the indicators of excellent practice. Documentation and recordkeeping assist professionals in reducing unethical behaviour, becoming aware of ethical issues at work, reducing patient complications, and improving service. The goal of this clinical audit is to assess the level of documentation after regional nerve block according to standards at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Methods: This clinical audit was conducted retrospectively on the completeness of documentation after regional nerve block for patients who received regional nerve block for analgesia and anesthesia purposes between April 20, 2023, and May 15, 2023, as part of quality improvement. For data collection, a checklist is created based on NYSORA, ASRA, and AAGBI guidelines. Result: Of the 67 record sheets, documentation of patient identity (sex, age, and name) (80.6%), availability of standard monitoring (n=45, 67.2%), name of nerve block (n=48, 71.6%), use of local anesthesia (n=41, 61.2%), and baseline vital signs (n=43, 64.2%) were recorded above 60%. However, the level of documentation of allergies and coagulation history, test dose, time-out performed before needle insertion, post-procedure instructions to the patient or parents, dose of epinephrine, events during the procedure, starting and ending time of the procedure, and adjuvants used were not recorded. Conclusion and recommendation: The practice of recording after peripheral nerve blocks at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital falls below the standard. This could be due to the lack of a separate sheet for peripheral nerve block and a lack of awareness. As a result, all anesthetists who will be involved in regional nerve blocks should receive training, and the standards should be re-audited to ensure compliance.
| Published in | American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Volume 14, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13 |
| Page(s) | 72-81 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Documentation, Audit, Nerve Block, Regional
| [1] | J. Heroux et al., "Functional recovery with peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia for upper limb surgery: a systematic review," BMC Anesthesiol, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 91, Mar 24 2023, |
| [2] | J. R. Hebl et al., "A pre–emptive multimodal pathway featuring peripheral nerve block improves perioperative outcomes after major orthopedic surgery," Reg Anesth Pain Med, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 510–7, Nov–Dec 2008. Available: |
| [3] | M. R. Jones et al., "Regional catheters for outpatient surgery—a comprehensive review," Current Pain & Headache Reports, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 24, 2019. Available: |
| [4] | B. M. Ilfeld, "Continous peripherial nerve block," Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 4, no. 113, 2011. |
| [5] | M. Koşucu, A. Beşir, & A. Eroğlu, "Peripheral nerve block to the lower extremity despite relative contraindication (two cases)," J Anesthesiol Clin Sci, vol. 2, pp. 1–4, 2013. |
| [6] | H. M. Ahmed et al., "Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project," Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 301–308, 2022. |
| [7] | A. Mathioudakis, I. Rousalova, A. A. Gagnat, N. Saad, & G. Hardavella, "How to keep good clinical records," Breathe, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 369–373, 2016. |
| [8] | C. Bentin & B. Rouge, "How to Report Post–op Pain Blocks," Outpatient surgery magazine, pp. 49–51, 2009. |
| [9] | M. F. Mulroy, R. S. Weller, & G. A. Liguori, "A checklist for performing regional nerve blocks," Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 195–199, 2014. |
| [10] | J. Arlidge, R. Abouelmagd, & D. Tong, "RA–UK Annual Scientific Meeting 2017 (Brighton)." |
| [11] | K. G&hi, V. Patel, T. Maliakal, D. Xu, & K. Flisinski, "Universal documentation sheet for peripheral nerve blocks," J New York School Reg Anesth, vol. 12, pp. 23–24, 2009. |
| [12] | S. Lamberty, "Development, Implementation, & Evaluation of a Preoperative Peripheral Nerve Block & Sedation Protocol," Rutgers University The State University of New Jersey, RBHS School of Nursing, 2022. |
| [13] | E. Forman & R. Smith, "Documentation of peripheral nerve blockade: a complete audit cycle," Anaesthesia, vol. 72, no. 11, 2017. |
| [14] | W. Chekol, Z. Denu, & H. Tawuye, "Audit on documentation completeness after regional nerve blocks at University of Gondar referral hospital, 2018," J Anesth Crit Open Access, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 208–211, 2018. |
| [15] | A. L. J. D. J. •, R. M. B. t. T. •, & B. t. V. M. Jeanne, "A substitution method to improve completeness of events documentation in anesthesia records," J Clin Monit Comput, 2015, |
| [16] | B. A. WILBANKS, J. A. A1 – MOSS, & E. S. A1 – BERNER, "– An Observational Study of the Accuracy & Completeness of an Anesthesia Information Management System: Recommendations for Documentation System Changes," JOUR, vol. 31, 2013, |
| [17] | R. A. B. Camp, U.–G. R. A. B. Worksh, N. B. App, A. A. App, N. Manual, & P. App, "Monitoring, Documentation, & Consent for Regional Anesthesia Procedures Monitoring, Documentation, & Consent for Regional Anesthesia Procedures," Ultrasound, 2026. |
| [18] | P. Cheng, A. Gilchrist, K. M. Robinson, & L. Paul, "The risk & consequences of clinical miscoding due to inadequate medical documentation: a case study of the impact on health services funding," Health Information Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2009. |
APA Style
Hordofa, T. A., Mossie, A., Legasse, A. S., Wale, E. (2026). Clinical Audit on Documentation Completeness After Regional Nerve Block at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 14(4), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13
ACS Style
Hordofa, T. A.; Mossie, A.; Legasse, A. S.; Wale, E. Clinical Audit on Documentation Completeness After Regional Nerve Block at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2026, 14(4), 72-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13,
author = {Tesfaye Asefa Hordofa and Addisu Mossie and Adanech Shifarew Legasse and Endeshaw Wale},
title = {Clinical Audit on Documentation Completeness After Regional Nerve Block at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital},
journal = {American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine},
volume = {14},
number = {4},
pages = {72-81},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcem.20261404.13},
abstract = {Background: A regional nerve block is a type of anesthesia in which local anesthetic medications are injected near a nerve to prevent nerve impulse transmission. Recording what a professional does is one of the indicators of excellent practice. Documentation and recordkeeping assist professionals in reducing unethical behaviour, becoming aware of ethical issues at work, reducing patient complications, and improving service. The goal of this clinical audit is to assess the level of documentation after regional nerve block according to standards at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Methods: This clinical audit was conducted retrospectively on the completeness of documentation after regional nerve block for patients who received regional nerve block for analgesia and anesthesia purposes between April 20, 2023, and May 15, 2023, as part of quality improvement. For data collection, a checklist is created based on NYSORA, ASRA, and AAGBI guidelines. Result: Of the 67 record sheets, documentation of patient identity (sex, age, and name) (80.6%), availability of standard monitoring (n=45, 67.2%), name of nerve block (n=48, 71.6%), use of local anesthesia (n=41, 61.2%), and baseline vital signs (n=43, 64.2%) were recorded above 60%. However, the level of documentation of allergies and coagulation history, test dose, time-out performed before needle insertion, post-procedure instructions to the patient or parents, dose of epinephrine, events during the procedure, starting and ending time of the procedure, and adjuvants used were not recorded. Conclusion and recommendation: The practice of recording after peripheral nerve blocks at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital falls below the standard. This could be due to the lack of a separate sheet for peripheral nerve block and a lack of awareness. As a result, all anesthetists who will be involved in regional nerve blocks should receive training, and the standards should be re-audited to ensure compliance.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Clinical Audit on Documentation Completeness After Regional Nerve Block at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital AU - Tesfaye Asefa Hordofa AU - Addisu Mossie AU - Adanech Shifarew Legasse AU - Endeshaw Wale Y1 - 2026/08/11 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13 T2 - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine JF - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine JO - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine SP - 72 EP - 81 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8133 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20261404.13 AB - Background: A regional nerve block is a type of anesthesia in which local anesthetic medications are injected near a nerve to prevent nerve impulse transmission. Recording what a professional does is one of the indicators of excellent practice. Documentation and recordkeeping assist professionals in reducing unethical behaviour, becoming aware of ethical issues at work, reducing patient complications, and improving service. The goal of this clinical audit is to assess the level of documentation after regional nerve block according to standards at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Methods: This clinical audit was conducted retrospectively on the completeness of documentation after regional nerve block for patients who received regional nerve block for analgesia and anesthesia purposes between April 20, 2023, and May 15, 2023, as part of quality improvement. For data collection, a checklist is created based on NYSORA, ASRA, and AAGBI guidelines. Result: Of the 67 record sheets, documentation of patient identity (sex, age, and name) (80.6%), availability of standard monitoring (n=45, 67.2%), name of nerve block (n=48, 71.6%), use of local anesthesia (n=41, 61.2%), and baseline vital signs (n=43, 64.2%) were recorded above 60%. However, the level of documentation of allergies and coagulation history, test dose, time-out performed before needle insertion, post-procedure instructions to the patient or parents, dose of epinephrine, events during the procedure, starting and ending time of the procedure, and adjuvants used were not recorded. Conclusion and recommendation: The practice of recording after peripheral nerve blocks at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital falls below the standard. This could be due to the lack of a separate sheet for peripheral nerve block and a lack of awareness. As a result, all anesthetists who will be involved in regional nerve blocks should receive training, and the standards should be re-audited to ensure compliance. VL - 14 IS - 4 ER -