The diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of Cushing’s syndrome is performed by any of the following biochemical tests: urine free cortisol, salivary cortisol at 11 pm and serum cortisol post 1 mg of dexamethasone. Collection of saliva samples is simple and noninvasive, thus being a method of choice for the evaluation of risk populations. The aim of this work is to analyze the performance of an automated chemiluminescent method for measurement of salivary cortisol at 11 pm according to the new quality guidelines and assess its clinical utility. Cortisol levels were measured in samples obtained by passive drooling from 32 healthy subjects and 9 patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Matrix effect, linearity, limit of blank, limit of quantitation, recovery and diagnostic performance were assessed. The Unicel 600 DXI Access Beckman Coulter chemiluminescent automated analyzer was used. The standard curve provided by the manufacturer was adapted to measure cortisol concentrations in saliva. Matrix effect: equation of the curve using salivary matrix: y=-1.824x+3.491 (95% CI=-2.068 to -1.582) vs. Equation of the curve using diluent matrix: y=-1.833x+3.394 (95% CI=-1.961 to -1.704). There is overlapping of both curves. Linearity: linear assay between 1.8 nmol/L and 108.0 nmol/L. Limit of blank: 0.1 nmol/L. Limit of quantitation: 1.8 nmol/L (TAE of 25%). Recovery: standard cortisol solution concentration 5 nmol/L: 102%; 10 nmol/L: 107%; 40nmol/L: 115%. Diagnostic performance: median and ranges in healthy subjects: 2.0 nmol/L (<2.0-9.0 nmol/L); Cushing’s syndrome: 30.3 nmol/L (15.4-61.0 nmol/L). ROC curve cutoff value: 9.0 nmol/L (100% Specificity; 100% Sensitivity; AUC=1.00). The method used provides excellent analytical performance for cortisol measurement in saliva at 11 pm, which makes it a valuable biochemical tool both for screening populations at risk for Cushing’s syndrome and for the follow-up and diagnosis of this condition.
Published in | American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Volume 7, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12 |
Page(s) | 130-134 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Salivary Cortisol, Cushing´s Syndrome, Analytical Performance
[1] | Lynnette K. Nieman, Beverly M. K. Biller, James W. Findling, John Newell-Price, Martin O. Savage, Paul M. Stewart, Victor M. Montori; The Diagnosis of Cushing's Syndrome: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2008; 93 (5): 1526–1540. |
[2] | Yaneva, M; Mosnier-Pudar, H; Dugué, M; Grabar, S; Fulla, I; Bertanga, X. Midnigthsalivary cortisol for the initial diagnosis of Cushing´s Syndrome of various causes. J ClinEndocrinolMetabol.2004; 89 (7): (3346-3351). |
[3] | Lopez Mondéjar, P;Fuentes, M; Mauri, M; Mora, A; Pérez Soto, M; Vargas, F; Hidalgo, A.Determinación de cortisol salival en el diagnóstico de Cushing pediátrico. An. Pediatr. Barcelona. 2006; 64 (3): (270-272). |
[4] | Kaufman E; Lamster B. The diagnostic applications of saliva. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.; 2002; 13 (2): 197-212. |
[5] | Gröschl, M. Current status of salivary hormone analysis. Clinical Chemistry. 2008; 54:11 (1759-1769). |
[6] | Inder W; Dimeski G; Russell A. Measurement of salivary cortisol in 2012. Laboratorytechniques and clinicalindications. Clin. Endocrinol. (oxf); 2012; 77: (645-651). |
[7] | Vining, R.; Mcginley, R.; Maksvytis, J.; Ho, K. Salivary cortisol: a better measure of adrenal cortical function than serum cortisol. Ann Clin Biochem 1983; 20 (329-335). |
[8] | Repetto E; González D; Jacobsen D; Smithuis F; Jamardo J; Cano M; Aranda C; Oneto A; Berg G; Fabre B. Evaluation of anautomated chemiluminescent immunoassay forsalivary cortisol measurement. Utility in the diagnosis of Cushing´s syndrome. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.; 2016, aop. |
[9] | Garde, A.; Hansen, A. Long-termstability of salivary cortisol. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 2005; 65:5: (433-436). |
[10] | Fabre B.; MeschV; Oneto A; Macalini G; Grosman H; Aranda C; BergG.La saliva y su utilidad en la evaluación de la función endocrinológica. Revista SAEGRE,2009;vol XVI; nº3: (26-43). |
[11] | Lepez M; Caamaño E; Romero C; Fiedler Y; Araya V. Determinación de los niveles de cortisol salival en una muestra de sujetos de Santiago de Chile. Rev. Med. Chile; 2010; vol 138;nº2:(168-174). |
[12] | Raff, H. Utility of salivary cortisol measurements in Cushing´s Syndrome and adrenal insufficiency. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94(10): (3647-3655). |
[13] | Katz, F.; Shannon, I. Adrenal corticosteroids in submaxillaryfluids. J Dental Research. 1969; 48(448-451). |
[14] | Walker, R.; Riad-Fahmy, D.; Read, G. Adrenal status assessed by directradioimmunoassay of cortisol in whole saliva orparotid saliva. Clin Chem. 1978; 24: (1460-1463). |
[15] | Beckman Coulter. Acess Immunoassay Systems. Access Cortisol. 2015. |
[16] | Fabre, B; Oneto, A; Schonfeld, C; Belli, S; Aranda, C. Evaluación del comportamiento de tres inmunoensayos (IE) en la medición de cortisol en saliva en una población normal. Revista Argentina de Endocrinología RAEM 2005; vol 42, nº suplementario, (p. 133). |
[17] | CLSI. Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach, 1st Edition. CLSI document EP06-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2003. |
[18] | CLSI. Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline- Second Edition. CLSI document EP17- A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012. |
[19] | Papanicolaou, D; Mullen, N; Kyrou, I; Nieman, L. Nightimesalivary cortisol: a useful test for the diagnosis of Cushing´s Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2002; 87 (10); (4515-4521). |
[20] | Badrick E, Kirschbaum C, Kumasi M. The Relationship between Smoking Status and Cortisol Secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92: (819-824). |
[21] | Kivlighan KT, Granger DA, Schwartz EB, Nelson V, Curran M, Shirtcliff EA. Quantifying blood leakage into the oral mucosa and its effects on the measurement of cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, and testosterone in saliva. Horm Behav 2004; 46: (39-44). |
[22] | Raff, H; Raff, J; Findling, JW. Late-Night Salivary Cortisol as a Screening Test for Cushing’s syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1998; 83(8); (2681-2686). |
[23] | Garde AH, Hansen AM. Long-termstability of salivary cortisol. Scand J ClinLab Invest. 2005; 65: (433-436). |
[24] | Forclaz, MV; Morato, E; Pennisi, A; Falco, S; Olsen, G; Rodríguez, P; Papazian, R; Bergadá, I. Niveles de cortisol en la saliva y séricos en recién nacidos. Arch Argent Pediatr 2017; 115 (3): 262-266. |
[25] | Raff, H; Findling, JW. A physiologicalapproach to diagnosis of Cushing´ssyndrome. Ann InternMed. 2003; 138: (980-991). |
[26] | Garrido, MP; Romero, CO; Cid, MPR; Araya, VQ. Detección de cortisol salival nocturno en una muestra de sujetos de Santiago de Chile, mediante la técnica de electroquimioluminiscencia. Rev. Chil. Endocrinol. Diabetes; 2015; 8 (3): (102-107). |
APA Style
Maria Alejandra Kloberdanz, Lucia Fernandez, Agustina Peverini, Fernando Smithuis, Adrian Aymard, et al. (2019). Evaluation of the Performance of an Automated Chemiluminescent Method (Access Beckman Coulter) for Determination of Salivary Cortisol and Clinical Utility. American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 7(6), 130-134. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12
ACS Style
Maria Alejandra Kloberdanz; Lucia Fernandez; Agustina Peverini; Fernando Smithuis; Adrian Aymard, et al. Evaluation of the Performance of an Automated Chemiluminescent Method (Access Beckman Coulter) for Determination of Salivary Cortisol and Clinical Utility. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019, 7(6), 130-134. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12
AMA Style
Maria Alejandra Kloberdanz, Lucia Fernandez, Agustina Peverini, Fernando Smithuis, Adrian Aymard, et al. Evaluation of the Performance of an Automated Chemiluminescent Method (Access Beckman Coulter) for Determination of Salivary Cortisol and Clinical Utility. Am J Clin Exp Med. 2019;7(6):130-134. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12, author = {Maria Alejandra Kloberdanz and Lucia Fernandez and Agustina Peverini and Fernando Smithuis and Adrian Aymard and Claudio Aranda and Bibiana Fabre and Martin Repetto and Adriana Oneto}, title = {Evaluation of the Performance of an Automated Chemiluminescent Method (Access Beckman Coulter) for Determination of Salivary Cortisol and Clinical Utility}, journal = {American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine}, volume = {7}, number = {6}, pages = {130-134}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcem.20190706.12}, abstract = {The diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of Cushing’s syndrome is performed by any of the following biochemical tests: urine free cortisol, salivary cortisol at 11 pm and serum cortisol post 1 mg of dexamethasone. Collection of saliva samples is simple and noninvasive, thus being a method of choice for the evaluation of risk populations. The aim of this work is to analyze the performance of an automated chemiluminescent method for measurement of salivary cortisol at 11 pm according to the new quality guidelines and assess its clinical utility. Cortisol levels were measured in samples obtained by passive drooling from 32 healthy subjects and 9 patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Matrix effect, linearity, limit of blank, limit of quantitation, recovery and diagnostic performance were assessed. The Unicel 600 DXI Access Beckman Coulter chemiluminescent automated analyzer was used. The standard curve provided by the manufacturer was adapted to measure cortisol concentrations in saliva. Matrix effect: equation of the curve using salivary matrix: y=-1.824x+3.491 (95% CI=-2.068 to -1.582) vs. Equation of the curve using diluent matrix: y=-1.833x+3.394 (95% CI=-1.961 to -1.704). There is overlapping of both curves. Linearity: linear assay between 1.8 nmol/L and 108.0 nmol/L. Limit of blank: 0.1 nmol/L. Limit of quantitation: 1.8 nmol/L (TAE of 25%). Recovery: standard cortisol solution concentration 5 nmol/L: 102%; 10 nmol/L: 107%; 40nmol/L: 115%. Diagnostic performance: median and ranges in healthy subjects: 2.0 nmol/L (<2.0-9.0 nmol/L); Cushing’s syndrome: 30.3 nmol/L (15.4-61.0 nmol/L). ROC curve cutoff value: 9.0 nmol/L (100% Specificity; 100% Sensitivity; AUC=1.00). The method used provides excellent analytical performance for cortisol measurement in saliva at 11 pm, which makes it a valuable biochemical tool both for screening populations at risk for Cushing’s syndrome and for the follow-up and diagnosis of this condition.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of the Performance of an Automated Chemiluminescent Method (Access Beckman Coulter) for Determination of Salivary Cortisol and Clinical Utility AU - Maria Alejandra Kloberdanz AU - Lucia Fernandez AU - Agustina Peverini AU - Fernando Smithuis AU - Adrian Aymard AU - Claudio Aranda AU - Bibiana Fabre AU - Martin Repetto AU - Adriana Oneto Y1 - 2019/12/06 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12 T2 - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine JF - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine JO - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine SP - 130 EP - 134 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8133 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20190706.12 AB - The diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of Cushing’s syndrome is performed by any of the following biochemical tests: urine free cortisol, salivary cortisol at 11 pm and serum cortisol post 1 mg of dexamethasone. Collection of saliva samples is simple and noninvasive, thus being a method of choice for the evaluation of risk populations. The aim of this work is to analyze the performance of an automated chemiluminescent method for measurement of salivary cortisol at 11 pm according to the new quality guidelines and assess its clinical utility. Cortisol levels were measured in samples obtained by passive drooling from 32 healthy subjects and 9 patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Matrix effect, linearity, limit of blank, limit of quantitation, recovery and diagnostic performance were assessed. The Unicel 600 DXI Access Beckman Coulter chemiluminescent automated analyzer was used. The standard curve provided by the manufacturer was adapted to measure cortisol concentrations in saliva. Matrix effect: equation of the curve using salivary matrix: y=-1.824x+3.491 (95% CI=-2.068 to -1.582) vs. Equation of the curve using diluent matrix: y=-1.833x+3.394 (95% CI=-1.961 to -1.704). There is overlapping of both curves. Linearity: linear assay between 1.8 nmol/L and 108.0 nmol/L. Limit of blank: 0.1 nmol/L. Limit of quantitation: 1.8 nmol/L (TAE of 25%). Recovery: standard cortisol solution concentration 5 nmol/L: 102%; 10 nmol/L: 107%; 40nmol/L: 115%. Diagnostic performance: median and ranges in healthy subjects: 2.0 nmol/L (<2.0-9.0 nmol/L); Cushing’s syndrome: 30.3 nmol/L (15.4-61.0 nmol/L). ROC curve cutoff value: 9.0 nmol/L (100% Specificity; 100% Sensitivity; AUC=1.00). The method used provides excellent analytical performance for cortisol measurement in saliva at 11 pm, which makes it a valuable biochemical tool both for screening populations at risk for Cushing’s syndrome and for the follow-up and diagnosis of this condition. VL - 7 IS - 6 ER -