Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Input Subsidy Reduction on Greenhouse Emission Reduction Potential in Paddy Production Systems in Karnataka State of India

Received: 28 April 2024     Accepted: 17 May 2024     Published: 30 May 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Increasing concerns and call for reduction in Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission have necessitated the search for broader and all-inclusive policy initiatives, extending into agricultural production, where high carbon energy inputs are used. One classical policy strategy for GHG emission reduction, has been taxation. However, given the critical role of agriculture, especially in developing economies, policies that directly or indirectly increase agricultural inputs costs and reduce their demand require stronger theoretical, conceptual and empirical support to ensure that while agri-environmental quality is promoted, welfare of farming households, food security and overall economic growth are not compromised. Using paddy production in Karnataka state in India, the study assessed effects of agricultural input taxation (reduction in rice input subsidy) on future demand for such inputs and their effect on GHG emission reduction, vis-a-viz production and welfare losses. In microeconomic modelling framework, we applied quadratic almost ideal demand system and stochastic efficiency functions in the analysis of the data. Data for the study, a micro-level farm data, was obtained from Cost of Cultivation Scheme (CSS) for irrigated and non-irrigated production systems, covering the period 2009 -2018 production seasons. Specifically, the study used three future tax regime scenarios- 10%, 20% and 30% input subsidy reduction rates, to model an optimum greenhouse emission reduction potential. The results revealed that inputs evaluated were normal with inelastic demand functions; many input coefficients implied significant complementary relationships; irrigated paddy production system had higher estimates of GHG emissions. Input taxation (reduction in subsidy) under all the three scenarios effectively, resulted in declined inputs consumption patterns, and subsequently led to significant decrease in greenhouse emissions. The highest GHG emission reduction potential was observed in irrigated farming system. Greenhouse emission reduction potential was optimal at moderate subsidy reduction policy rate of 10%. It is recommended that, given the inelastic estimates derived, moderate tax (reduction in subsidy) policy option on inputs would yield effective greenhouse mitigation with appropriate compensation through effective integrative schemes.

Published in American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11
Page(s) 18-27
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Input Demand Elasticities, Greenhouse Emission, Input Taxation, Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System, Welfare Loss, Climate Action, Paddy Production

References
[1] Balogh, J. M. (2023). The impacts of agricultural subsidies of Common Agricultural Policy on agricultural emissions: The case of the European Union. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 69, 2023 (4): 140–150.
[2] Banks, J., Blundell, R. and Lewbel, A. (1997). Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 79(4). 527–539.
[3] Benbi, D. K. (2018). Carbon footprint and agricultural sustainability nexus in an intensively cultivated region of Indo-Gangetic Plains. Sci. of the Total Env. 644: 611–623.
[4] Blandford, D., and Josling, T. (2009). Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policies and Agriculture: Implications for Production Incentives and International Trade Disciplines. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). International Environment House 2, 7 Chemin de Balexert, 1219, Geneva, Switzerland.
[5] Blay, J. K., Lokesha, H. & Abunyuwah, I. (2024). Evaluation of input subsidy reduction and greenhouse emission reduction potential in cotton production systems in Karnataka, India. DAEEE Working paper 00012.
[6] Central Statistical Organization (2021). Manual on Cost of Cultivation Surveys. Central Statistical Organization, Government of India.
[7] Deaton, A. and Muelbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review. 70(3): 312–336.
[8] Du, Y., Liu, H., Huang, H., and Li, X. (2023) The carbon emission reduction effect of agricultural policy——Evidence from China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 406, 137005,
[9] Dumortier, J and Elobeid, A. (2021). Effects of a carbon tax in the United States on agricultural markets and carbon emissions from land-use change. Land Use Policy. 103. 105320.
[10] Douenne, T. (2016). Taxing energy in France: distributive and environmental effects under a Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System. Paris School of Economics, Université Paris-1.
[11] FAO. (2020). FAOSTAT Emissions shares,
[12] Fusco, G., Campobasso, F., Laureti, L., Frittelli, M., Valente, D. and Petrosillo, I. (2023). The environmental impact of agriculture: An instrument to support public policy. Ecological Indicators, 147.
[13] Goyal, S. K. And Berg, E. (2003). Supply Response and Input Demand on Paddy Farms in Haryana, India—A Panel Data Analysis. Ind. J. of Agri. Econ, 58(2): 264–273.
[14] Grace, P. (2008). A cotton farm’s carbon and greenhouse footprint. CRDC conference paper.
[15] Hardaker, J. B., Huirne, R. B. M., Anderson, J. R. and Lien, G. (2004). Coping with Risk in Agriculture, CABI Pub, Cambridge, MA.
[16] IPCC. (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Japan.
[17] Jack, B. K., Jayachandran, S., Kala, N. and Pande, R. (2023). Money (Not) to Burn: Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Crop Residue Burning. American Economic Association, AEARCTR-0004508.
[18] Jansson, T., Malmström, N., Johansson, H. and Choi, H. (2023): Carbon taxes and agriculture: the benefit of a multilateral agreement. Climate Policy,
[19] Kashyap, D. and Agarwal, T. (2021). Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint of Rice and Wheat Production in Punjab, India. Agricultural Systems. 186: 1-9.
[20] Laborde, D., Mamun, A., Martin, W., Piñeiro, V. and Vos, R. (2021). Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Communications, 12: 2601.
[21] Liang, H., Meng, Y. and Ishii, K. (2022). The effect of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions reduction policies: evidence from the middle and lower basin of Yangtze River, China. Discover Sustainability, 3: 43
[22] Liu, Z., Lang, L., Hu, B., Shi, L., Huang, B., Zhao, Y. (2021). Emission reduction decision of agricultural supply chain considering carbon tax and investment cooperation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126305.
[23] Lynch, J., Cain, M., Frame, D. and Pierrehumbert, R. (2021) Agriculture’s Contribution to Climate Change and Role in Mitigation Is Distinct from Predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4: 518039.
[24] Meyer-Aurich, A., Karatay, Y. N and Nausediene, A. 2020. Effectivity and Cost Efficiency of a Tax on Nitrogen fertilizer to reduce GHG Emission from Agriculture. Atmosphere. 11(607): 1-9.
[25] Neufeldt, H. and Schäfer, M (2008). Mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture using a regional economic-ecosystem model. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 123 (4): 305-316.
[26] OECD. (2006). The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes - OECD. OECD.
[27] Ollier, A., and Cara, S. D. (2024). Give and take: An analysis of the distributional consequences of emission tax-and-rebate schemes with an application to greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture, Ecological Economics, 219,108154.
[28] Poi, B. (2012). Easy demand-system estimation with quaids. Stata Journal. 12(3). Purola, T and Lehtonen, H. (2022). Farm-Level Effects of Emissions Tax and Adjustable Drainage on Peatlands. Environmental Management, 69: 154–168.
[29] Pyke, B. (2009). The Impacts of Carbon Trading on the Cotton Industry. 68th ICAC Plenary, Cape Town.
[30] Shah, A., Larsen, B. (1992). Carbon taxes, the greenhouse effect, and developing countries. (No. 957) Policy Research Working Paper Series, Policy Research Working Paper Series. The World Bank.
[31] Song. S., Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., and Ma, Y. (2023). Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Inputs in China over the Past Three Decades. Agriculture, 13(5), 919;
[32] Ştefan, V. Bănica, R., Rauch, E., Roşca, L., Edelmann, J., Zalega, A. and Meisenzahl, M. (2022) Energy taxation, carbon pricing and energy subsidies. European Court of Auditors. 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615, Luxembourg.
[33] Waithaka, S. (2023). Effects of Agriculture on the Environment. International Journal of Agriculture, 8(1): 10-20.
[34] Wirsenius, S., Hedenus, F. & Mohlin, K. (2011). Greenhouse gas taxes on animal food products: rationale, tax scheme and climate mitigation effects. Climatic Change, 108: 159–184.
[35] World Resources Institute, (2019). Climate watch.
[36] Wu, Z., Feng, X., Yumei Zhang, Y. and Fan, S. (2024). Repositioning fertilizer manufacturing subsidies for improving food security and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(2): 430–443.
[37] Yuzbashkandi, S. S., And Mehrjo, A. (2020). Towards agricultural demand for the main energy carriers in Iran. Application of linear approximate almost ideal demand system (LA-AIDS) analysis. Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 19: 313-318.
[38] Yeager, E. A., Langmemeier, M. R. and Xia, T. (2011). Impact of tillage system on input demands for farms. Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University. Manhattan.
[39] Zech, K. M and Schneider, U. A. (2019). Carbon leakage and limited efficiency of greenhouse gas taxes on food products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213: 99-103,
[40] Zhang, L., Ruiz-Menjivar, J. Tong, O., Zhang, J, Yue, M. (2021). Examining the carbon footprint of rice production and consumption in Hubei, China: A life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113698.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Blay, J. K., Lokesha, H., Abunyuwah, I. (2024). Effect of Input Subsidy Reduction on Greenhouse Emission Reduction Potential in Paddy Production Systems in Karnataka State of India. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 10(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Blay, J. K.; Lokesha, H.; Abunyuwah, I. Effect of Input Subsidy Reduction on Greenhouse Emission Reduction Potential in Paddy Production Systems in Karnataka State of India. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2024, 10(2), 18-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Blay JK, Lokesha H, Abunyuwah I. Effect of Input Subsidy Reduction on Greenhouse Emission Reduction Potential in Paddy Production Systems in Karnataka State of India. Am J Biol Environ Stat. 2024;10(2):18-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11,
      author = {James Kofi Blay and Huchaiah Lokesha and Isaac Abunyuwah},
      title = {Effect of Input Subsidy Reduction on Greenhouse Emission Reduction Potential in Paddy Production Systems in Karnataka State of India
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {18-27},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20241002.11},
      abstract = {Increasing concerns and call for reduction in Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission have necessitated the search for broader and all-inclusive policy initiatives, extending into agricultural production, where high carbon energy inputs are used. One classical policy strategy for GHG emission reduction, has been taxation. However, given the critical role of agriculture, especially in developing economies, policies that directly or indirectly increase agricultural inputs costs and reduce their demand require stronger theoretical, conceptual and empirical support to ensure that while agri-environmental quality is promoted, welfare of farming households, food security and overall economic growth are not compromised. Using paddy production in Karnataka state in India, the study assessed effects of agricultural input taxation (reduction in rice input subsidy) on future demand for such inputs and their effect on GHG emission reduction, vis-a-viz production and welfare losses. In microeconomic modelling framework, we applied quadratic almost ideal demand system and stochastic efficiency functions in the analysis of the data. Data for the study, a micro-level farm data, was obtained from Cost of Cultivation Scheme (CSS) for irrigated and non-irrigated production systems, covering the period 2009 -2018 production seasons. Specifically, the study used three future tax regime scenarios- 10%, 20% and 30% input subsidy reduction rates, to model an optimum greenhouse emission reduction potential. The results revealed that inputs evaluated were normal with inelastic demand functions; many input coefficients implied significant complementary relationships; irrigated paddy production system had higher estimates of GHG emissions. Input taxation (reduction in subsidy) under all the three scenarios effectively, resulted in declined inputs consumption patterns, and subsequently led to significant decrease in greenhouse emissions. The highest GHG emission reduction potential was observed in irrigated farming system. Greenhouse emission reduction potential was optimal at moderate subsidy reduction policy rate of 10%. It is recommended that, given the inelastic estimates derived, moderate tax (reduction in subsidy) policy option on inputs would yield effective greenhouse mitigation with appropriate compensation through effective integrative schemes.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of Input Subsidy Reduction on Greenhouse Emission Reduction Potential in Paddy Production Systems in Karnataka State of India
    
    AU  - James Kofi Blay
    AU  - Huchaiah Lokesha
    AU  - Isaac Abunyuwah
    Y1  - 2024/05/30
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11
    T2  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    JF  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    JO  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
    SP  - 18
    EP  - 27
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2471-979X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241002.11
    AB  - Increasing concerns and call for reduction in Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission have necessitated the search for broader and all-inclusive policy initiatives, extending into agricultural production, where high carbon energy inputs are used. One classical policy strategy for GHG emission reduction, has been taxation. However, given the critical role of agriculture, especially in developing economies, policies that directly or indirectly increase agricultural inputs costs and reduce their demand require stronger theoretical, conceptual and empirical support to ensure that while agri-environmental quality is promoted, welfare of farming households, food security and overall economic growth are not compromised. Using paddy production in Karnataka state in India, the study assessed effects of agricultural input taxation (reduction in rice input subsidy) on future demand for such inputs and their effect on GHG emission reduction, vis-a-viz production and welfare losses. In microeconomic modelling framework, we applied quadratic almost ideal demand system and stochastic efficiency functions in the analysis of the data. Data for the study, a micro-level farm data, was obtained from Cost of Cultivation Scheme (CSS) for irrigated and non-irrigated production systems, covering the period 2009 -2018 production seasons. Specifically, the study used three future tax regime scenarios- 10%, 20% and 30% input subsidy reduction rates, to model an optimum greenhouse emission reduction potential. The results revealed that inputs evaluated were normal with inelastic demand functions; many input coefficients implied significant complementary relationships; irrigated paddy production system had higher estimates of GHG emissions. Input taxation (reduction in subsidy) under all the three scenarios effectively, resulted in declined inputs consumption patterns, and subsequently led to significant decrease in greenhouse emissions. The highest GHG emission reduction potential was observed in irrigated farming system. Greenhouse emission reduction potential was optimal at moderate subsidy reduction policy rate of 10%. It is recommended that, given the inelastic estimates derived, moderate tax (reduction in subsidy) policy option on inputs would yield effective greenhouse mitigation with appropriate compensation through effective integrative schemes.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections