Tef is stable crop food in Ethiopia. However, many farmers were not food secured and only few model farmers used tef for their daily local food. This is due to the use of low yielder varieties. On the other hand, improved tef varieties were not disseminated for surplus production. Therefore, it is important to find the way of improved tef varieties were disseminated in potential areas of Guji zone. This activity was conducted to popularize improved Dagim tef variety, strengthen stakeholders’ linkage and to improve farmers’ income. Purposively, Adola Rede, Odo Shakiso and Wadera were selected based on their tef potential and suitable for monitoring. Seven (7) kebeles were selected from the selected districts. Totally, 83 farmers were selected for pre scaling up tef at the midlands of Guji zone. In addition, four FTCs were used as multiplication site as a seed source for the next season. 400kg of Dagim variety was distributed. Each farmer was obtained 4.5kg Dagim variety and sown it on 0.25ha. Training was used to enhance farmers’ knowledge and skills on Dagim production and field day was used to motivate farmers to grow Dagim tef variety. The stakeholder had participated during training and field day to strengthen linkage on seed, agricultural inputs and information. Hand weeding and herbicide was used to control weed. Yield, cost of production and farmers perception were collected by interview method. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, net income and narration. The yield performance of Dagim variety was 9.82 qt/ha which low compared to national and demonstration stage due to lack of rainfall during 2020 and 2021/22 year. The result of net income showed that production of Dagim variety generated a return of 15735.72 ETB/ha. More net income (17551.63 ETB/ha) was obtained at Odo Shakiso district followed by Adola Rede district (16503.36 ETB/ha). There was a good yield and income at some farmers who sown Dagim variety at mid of September month. Dagim variety should be disseminated in the midland districts of Guji Zone. Since tef can be produced twice in a year provision of tef variety and fertilizer for farmers should available based the seasons.
Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13 |
Page(s) | 18-22 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pre Scaling up, Tef, Dagim, Guji
[1] | Demeke M, Marcantonio D (2013). Analysis of incentives and disincentives for tef in Ethiopia. MAFAP, SPAAA. |
[2] | Kaleab B (2018). Nutrient composition and health benefits. The Economics of Teff: Exploring Ethiopia’s Biggest Cash Crop, 2018. International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, DC. Chapter 15. |
[3] | Barretto R, Buenavista RM, Rivera JL, Wang S, Prasad PV, Siliveru K. 2021. Teff (Eragrostis tef) processing, utilization and future opportunities: a review. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 56 (7): 3125-3137. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14872. |
[4] | L. Spaenij-Dekking, Y. Kooy-Winkelaar, and F. Koning, “The Ethiopian Cereal Tef in Celiac Disease,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 353, no. 16, pp. 1748–1749, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1056/NEJMc051492. |
[5] | Zhu, F., 2018. Chemical composition and food uses of teff (Eragrostis tef). Food Chem. 239, 402–415. |
[6] | K. Baye, “Teff: nutrient composition and health benefits. ESSP Working Paper 67. Washington, D. C. and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI),” p. 20, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/128 334 |
[7] | Fikadu, Asmiro A, Wedu, Tsega D, Derseh, Endalew A. Review on Economics of Teff in Ethiopia. Open Acc Biostat Bioinform. 2 (3). OABB. 000539. 2019. DOI: 10.31031/OABB.2018.02.000539. |
[8] | I. Alaunyte, V. Stojceska, A. Plunkett, P. Ainsworth, and E. Derbyshire, “Improving the quality of nutrient-rich Teff (Eragrostis tef) breads by combination of enzymes in straight dough and sourdough breadmaking,” J. Cereal Sci., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 22–30, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.09.005. |
[9] | Bekele AE, Tekalign S, Mitiku F. 2020. Gender Roles in Teff Value chain in Borecha District of South Western Ethiopia: Husband and Wife Comparisons. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development 55 (1): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.17306/J.JARD.2020.01212. |
[10] | Mihretie FA, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Tsubo M, Masunaga T, Bayable M. 2021. Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in Midland Agro-Ecology, Ethiopia. Agriculture 11 (4), https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040298. |
[11] | Central Statistical Agency (CSA). 2021. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2020/21 (2013 E. C.) Volume I Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season). Stat Bull 590 I: 139. |
[12] | Worku Kebede, Kidist Tolosa, Tsion Fikre, Yazachew Genet, Solomon Chanyalew, Mengistu Demissie, Kebebew Assefa, Habte Jifar, Nigus Belay, Getahun Bekana, Kidu Gebremeskel, Girma Chemeda, Molalign Assefa, Sewagegn Tariku, Zerihun Tadele. Tef (Eragrostis tef) Variety Development for High Potential Areas of Ethiopia. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. Vol. 10, No. 2, 2022, pp. 23-28. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20221002.11. |
[13] | Gadisa Muleta, Addisu Getahun. Impact of Technology Adoption on Household Income: The Case of Tef in Dendi District, Ethiopia. Economics. Vol. 11, No. 2, 2022, pp. 69-75. doi: 10.11648/j.eco.20221102.11. |
[14] | Basha Kebede and Dembi Korji 2017 Demonstration of improved teff varieties at selected midland districts of Guji zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7 (7), 131-135. |
[15] | Kebede B, Teshome G, Assefa K, Chimdessa O, Alemu S, et al. (2018) Participatory Evaluation and Selection of Improved Tef Varieties in Agro pastoral areas of Guji Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. J AgriSci Food Res 9: 213. |
[16] | M. G. Wordofa, J. Y. Hassen, G. S. Endris, C. S. Aweke, D. K. Moges, and D. T. Rorisa, “Adoption of improved agricultural technology and its impact on household income: a propensity score matching estimation in eastern Ethiopia,” Agriculture & Food Security, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021. |
[17] | Kebede Basha, Amare Girma, Korji Dembi. Pre extension Demonstration of Tef Technologies at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science. Vol. 6, No. 5, 2021, pp. 116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ijees.20210605.11. |
[18] | Girma Amare, Basha Kebede and Dembi Korji, “Pre Extension Demonstration of Selected Lablab Varieties at Midlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia.”, International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 7 (7), 2020, pp. 08-12. |
[19] | Basha Kebede, Girma Amare and Dembi Korji 2021. Popularization of Sanate Bread Wheat Variety in the Highlands of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. International journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food Science. Vol-5, Issue-3, May-Jun, 2021. Article DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijhaf.5.3.4 |
APA Style
Girma Amare, Basha Kebede, Dembi Korji, Tekle Bobo. (2023). Pre Scaling up of Tef Variety at Midland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 11(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13
ACS Style
Girma Amare; Basha Kebede; Dembi Korji; Tekle Bobo. Pre Scaling up of Tef Variety at Midland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2023, 11(1), 18-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13
AMA Style
Girma Amare, Basha Kebede, Dembi Korji, Tekle Bobo. Pre Scaling up of Tef Variety at Midland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2023;11(1):18-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13, author = {Girma Amare and Basha Kebede and Dembi Korji and Tekle Bobo}, title = {Pre Scaling up of Tef Variety at Midland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {18-22}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20231101.13}, abstract = {Tef is stable crop food in Ethiopia. However, many farmers were not food secured and only few model farmers used tef for their daily local food. This is due to the use of low yielder varieties. On the other hand, improved tef varieties were not disseminated for surplus production. Therefore, it is important to find the way of improved tef varieties were disseminated in potential areas of Guji zone. This activity was conducted to popularize improved Dagim tef variety, strengthen stakeholders’ linkage and to improve farmers’ income. Purposively, Adola Rede, Odo Shakiso and Wadera were selected based on their tef potential and suitable for monitoring. Seven (7) kebeles were selected from the selected districts. Totally, 83 farmers were selected for pre scaling up tef at the midlands of Guji zone. In addition, four FTCs were used as multiplication site as a seed source for the next season. 400kg of Dagim variety was distributed. Each farmer was obtained 4.5kg Dagim variety and sown it on 0.25ha. Training was used to enhance farmers’ knowledge and skills on Dagim production and field day was used to motivate farmers to grow Dagim tef variety. The stakeholder had participated during training and field day to strengthen linkage on seed, agricultural inputs and information. Hand weeding and herbicide was used to control weed. Yield, cost of production and farmers perception were collected by interview method. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, net income and narration. The yield performance of Dagim variety was 9.82 qt/ha which low compared to national and demonstration stage due to lack of rainfall during 2020 and 2021/22 year. The result of net income showed that production of Dagim variety generated a return of 15735.72 ETB/ha. More net income (17551.63 ETB/ha) was obtained at Odo Shakiso district followed by Adola Rede district (16503.36 ETB/ha). There was a good yield and income at some farmers who sown Dagim variety at mid of September month. Dagim variety should be disseminated in the midland districts of Guji Zone. Since tef can be produced twice in a year provision of tef variety and fertilizer for farmers should available based the seasons.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Pre Scaling up of Tef Variety at Midland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Girma Amare AU - Basha Kebede AU - Dembi Korji AU - Tekle Bobo Y1 - 2023/03/16 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 18 EP - 22 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.13 AB - Tef is stable crop food in Ethiopia. However, many farmers were not food secured and only few model farmers used tef for their daily local food. This is due to the use of low yielder varieties. On the other hand, improved tef varieties were not disseminated for surplus production. Therefore, it is important to find the way of improved tef varieties were disseminated in potential areas of Guji zone. This activity was conducted to popularize improved Dagim tef variety, strengthen stakeholders’ linkage and to improve farmers’ income. Purposively, Adola Rede, Odo Shakiso and Wadera were selected based on their tef potential and suitable for monitoring. Seven (7) kebeles were selected from the selected districts. Totally, 83 farmers were selected for pre scaling up tef at the midlands of Guji zone. In addition, four FTCs were used as multiplication site as a seed source for the next season. 400kg of Dagim variety was distributed. Each farmer was obtained 4.5kg Dagim variety and sown it on 0.25ha. Training was used to enhance farmers’ knowledge and skills on Dagim production and field day was used to motivate farmers to grow Dagim tef variety. The stakeholder had participated during training and field day to strengthen linkage on seed, agricultural inputs and information. Hand weeding and herbicide was used to control weed. Yield, cost of production and farmers perception were collected by interview method. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, net income and narration. The yield performance of Dagim variety was 9.82 qt/ha which low compared to national and demonstration stage due to lack of rainfall during 2020 and 2021/22 year. The result of net income showed that production of Dagim variety generated a return of 15735.72 ETB/ha. More net income (17551.63 ETB/ha) was obtained at Odo Shakiso district followed by Adola Rede district (16503.36 ETB/ha). There was a good yield and income at some farmers who sown Dagim variety at mid of September month. Dagim variety should be disseminated in the midland districts of Guji Zone. Since tef can be produced twice in a year provision of tef variety and fertilizer for farmers should available based the seasons. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -