| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Early Maturing Sorghum and Cowpea Varieties Intercropping for Animal Nutritive Value and in vitro Digestibility in Fedis District, Eastern Ethiopia

Received: 9 February 2021     Accepted: 24 March 2021     Published: 23 April 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The shortage of arable land and shortage of livestock feed specially quality feed resources are major constraints in East Hararghe Zone. Thus, a field study was conducted to evaluate an early maturing sorghum varieties and cowpea Lines intercropping for both food and feed production at Fedis Agricultural Research Center, eastern Ethiopia in 2018/19 cropping season. Two cowpea varieties (lines) (9333 and 9334) were intercropped with three varieties of early maturing sorghum (Teshale, Birhan and Melkam) and compared with sole cropping of all the varieties, which were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The analyzed result showed the NDF content was significantly different (p < 0.05) among intercropped and sole sorghum the maximum NDF was recorded from sole sorghum Teshale (69.56%) and the minimum sorghum Birhan + cowpea (9333) (57.75%) and the Intercropping sorghum improved the CP of sorghum stover mean from sole (5.31%) to intercropped (6.03%). the. Cropping systems and cowpea lines were significantly affected (p < 0.05) the content of CP and NDF. The maximum CP obtained from cowpea (9334) + sorghum Teshale 29.19%), and the minimum CP obtained from sole cowpea (9333) (24.38%). Generally, the results of this study showed that intercropping of sorghum-cowpea were increased nutritional quality of cowpea and sorghum stover. Based on the results of this study, it concluded that intercropping sorghum with forage cowpea; preferably sorghum Melkam + cowpea (9333) to be appropriate to increase quality of sorghum stover in the study area.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18
Page(s) 95-100
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chemical Composition, Digestibility, Forage Legumes

References
[1] Adugna Tolera. 2007. Feed resources for producing export quality meat and livestock in Ethiopia. Ethiopia Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards and Livestock and Meat Marketing project (SPS-LMM). 77.
[2] Ahmad, A. H., Ahmad, R. and Mahmood, N. 2007b. Production potential and quality of mixed sorghum forage under different intercropping systems and planting patterns. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 44: 87-93.
[3] AOAC (Association of Official Analytical chemists). 1994. Official methods of analysis 12th ed. Washington. DC.
[4] Brooker, R. W., A. J. Karley, A. C. Newton, R. J. Pakeman, C. Schöb. 2016. Facilitation and sustainable agriculture: a mechanistic approach to reconciling crop production and conservation. Function of Ecologies. 30 (1): 98-107.
[5] Cook, D. R., Zhu, H., Choi, H. K. and Shoemaker, R. C. 2005. Bridging model and crop legumes through comparative genomics. Plant physiology, 137 (4): 1189-1196.
[6] Fuad Abduselam, Samuel Tegene, Zeleqe Legese, Fikadu Tadesse, Alemayehu Biri and Taye Tessema. 2018. Evaluation of Early Maturing Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Varieties, for Yield and Yield Components in the Lowlands of Eastern Hararghe. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 8 (1): 40-43.
[7] Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edition. John Viley and Sons Inc., New York.
[8] Iqbal M. 2018. Comparative performance of forage cowpea accessions as companion crops with sorghum under varied harvesting times. Bragantia, 77: 476-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017247
[9] Jackson, M. L. 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis. Constable & Co. Ltd. London 4, UK.
[10] Jeans. N and Yolande, JP. 2007. prediction of digestibility of OM and energy in the growing pig from an in vitro method. Animal feed science and Technology, 134 (3): 211-222.
[11] Kermah, M., Franke, A. C., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Ahiabor, B. D., Abaidoo, R. C. and Giller, K. E., 2017. Maize-grain legume intercropping for enhanced resource use efficiency and crop productivity in the Guinea savanna of northern Ghana. Field crops research, 213, pp. 38-50.
[12] Maleda Birhan. 2013. Role of Seeding Rates and Cutting Stages on Yield and Quality of Forage Intercropping in the Case of North Gondar, Ethiopia, LAP, LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-659-25690-5-1.
[13] Mergia Abera, 2012. The Effect of Under Sowing of Forage Legumes in Maize on Dry Matter Yield and Nutritional Value of the Fodder in Baresa Watershed, Ethiopia. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064.
[14] Mekuanint Gashaw and Girma Defar. 2017. Livestock feed resources, nutritional value and their implication on animal productivity in mixed farming system in Gasera and Ginnir Districts, Bale Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Livestock Production, 8 (2): 12-23.
[15] Musa, E. M., Elsheikh, E. A., Mohamed Ahmed, I. A. and Babiker, E. E., 2011. Intercropping sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.): effect of Bradyrhizobium inoculation and fertilization on minerals composition of sorghum seeds. ISRN Agronomy.
[16] Njoka-Njiru, E. N., Njarui, M. G., Abdulrazak, S. A and Mureithi, J. G, 2006. Effect of intercropping herbaceous legumes with Napier grass on dry matter yield and nutritive value of the feedstuffs in semi-arid regions of eastern Kenya. Agricultural Tropical and Subtropical, 39 (4).
[17] Solomon Gebreyowhans and Kibrom Gebremeskel. 2014. Forage production potential and nutritive value of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) genotypes in the northern lowlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 5 (4): Available online http://www.e3journals.org
[18] Tewodros Tefera, Kebebe Ergano and Waktola Tiki, 2007. Operational Research and Capacity Building for Food Security and Sustainable Livelihoods. Proceeding of Irish Supported Operational Research Project review Workshop. 2007. Hawassa.
[19] Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 18: 104–111.
[20] Usman Semman. 2014. Effect Of Different Spacing of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Intercropped with or without Lablab (Lablab purpureus) On Biomass Yield and Nutritional Value of Napier Grass. MSc Thesis. Hramaya University.
[21] Van Soest, P. J. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 50: 50-55.
[22] Yildirim, E. and Guvenc, I. 2005. Intercropping based on cauliflower: more productive, profitable and highly sustainable. European Journal of Agronomy, 22 (1): 11-18.
[23] Zenna T. 2016. Business and management consultancy (TZBMC), CARE ABDISHE/linking initiatives, stakeholders to achieve gender-sensitive livelihood security (LINKAGES) project end line evaluation report.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Wubshet Tesfaye, Tessema Zewdu. (2021). Evaluation of Early Maturing Sorghum and Cowpea Varieties Intercropping for Animal Nutritive Value and in vitro Digestibility in Fedis District, Eastern Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(2), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Wubshet Tesfaye; Tessema Zewdu. Evaluation of Early Maturing Sorghum and Cowpea Varieties Intercropping for Animal Nutritive Value and in vitro Digestibility in Fedis District, Eastern Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(2), 95-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Wubshet Tesfaye, Tessema Zewdu. Evaluation of Early Maturing Sorghum and Cowpea Varieties Intercropping for Animal Nutritive Value and in vitro Digestibility in Fedis District, Eastern Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(2):95-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18,
      author = {Wubshet Tesfaye and Tessema Zewdu},
      title = {Evaluation of Early Maturing Sorghum and Cowpea Varieties Intercropping for Animal Nutritive Value and in vitro Digestibility in Fedis District, Eastern Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {95-100},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210902.18},
      abstract = {The shortage of arable land and shortage of livestock feed specially quality feed resources are major constraints in East Hararghe Zone. Thus, a field study was conducted to evaluate an early maturing sorghum varieties and cowpea Lines intercropping for both food and feed production at Fedis Agricultural Research Center, eastern Ethiopia in 2018/19 cropping season. Two cowpea varieties (lines) (9333 and 9334) were intercropped with three varieties of early maturing sorghum (Teshale, Birhan and Melkam) and compared with sole cropping of all the varieties, which were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The analyzed result showed the NDF content was significantly different (p < 0.05) among intercropped and sole sorghum the maximum NDF was recorded from sole sorghum Teshale (69.56%) and the minimum sorghum Birhan + cowpea (9333) (57.75%) and the Intercropping sorghum improved the CP of sorghum stover mean from sole (5.31%) to intercropped (6.03%). the. Cropping systems and cowpea lines were significantly affected (p < 0.05) the content of CP and NDF. The maximum CP obtained from cowpea (9334) + sorghum Teshale 29.19%), and the minimum CP obtained from sole cowpea (9333) (24.38%). Generally, the results of this study showed that intercropping of sorghum-cowpea were increased nutritional quality of cowpea and sorghum stover. Based on the results of this study, it concluded that intercropping sorghum with forage cowpea; preferably sorghum Melkam + cowpea (9333) to be appropriate to increase quality of sorghum stover in the study area.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Early Maturing Sorghum and Cowpea Varieties Intercropping for Animal Nutritive Value and in vitro Digestibility in Fedis District, Eastern Ethiopia
    AU  - Wubshet Tesfaye
    AU  - Tessema Zewdu
    Y1  - 2021/04/23
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 95
    EP  - 100
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.18
    AB  - The shortage of arable land and shortage of livestock feed specially quality feed resources are major constraints in East Hararghe Zone. Thus, a field study was conducted to evaluate an early maturing sorghum varieties and cowpea Lines intercropping for both food and feed production at Fedis Agricultural Research Center, eastern Ethiopia in 2018/19 cropping season. Two cowpea varieties (lines) (9333 and 9334) were intercropped with three varieties of early maturing sorghum (Teshale, Birhan and Melkam) and compared with sole cropping of all the varieties, which were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The analyzed result showed the NDF content was significantly different (p < 0.05) among intercropped and sole sorghum the maximum NDF was recorded from sole sorghum Teshale (69.56%) and the minimum sorghum Birhan + cowpea (9333) (57.75%) and the Intercropping sorghum improved the CP of sorghum stover mean from sole (5.31%) to intercropped (6.03%). the. Cropping systems and cowpea lines were significantly affected (p < 0.05) the content of CP and NDF. The maximum CP obtained from cowpea (9334) + sorghum Teshale 29.19%), and the minimum CP obtained from sole cowpea (9333) (24.38%). Generally, the results of this study showed that intercropping of sorghum-cowpea were increased nutritional quality of cowpea and sorghum stover. Based on the results of this study, it concluded that intercropping sorghum with forage cowpea; preferably sorghum Melkam + cowpea (9333) to be appropriate to increase quality of sorghum stover in the study area.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Fedis Agricultural Research Center, Harar, Ethiopia

  • Department of Animal Science and Range, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

  • Sections