This study investigates the ionospheric response over the equatorial and low-latitude regions in African during the geomagnetic storm that occurred on 10–11 October 2024. In order to investigate the ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of varying intensities, a detailed study of vertical Total Electron Content (TEC) variations resulting from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and International Reference Ionosphere 2020 (IRI2020) data acquired at the Africa sector has been carried out in this work. The data used include GNSS measurements from International GNSS Service (IGS) African eight stations, IRI2020 model, O/N2 ratio information obtained by the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics/Global Ultraviolet Imager (TIMED/GUVI), magnetometer data, and an ionospheric electric fields model. The integrity of GNSS is critically dependent on the state of the Earth’s ionosphere. During space weather events like geomagnetic storms, the ionosphere can become highly disturbed, leading to signal scintillations and severe degradation of navigation reliability. The deviation in TEC was used to observe the ionospheric storm effects. The results show both positive enhancements and negative depletions in TEC across the stations during the events. The findings reveal significant TEC enhancements over the Yamoussoukro (YKRO) and Lusaka (ZAMB) stations, while reductions were observed at the Antananarivo (ABPO), Addis Ababa (ADIS), Djibouti (DJIG), Malindi (MAL2), Mafikeng (MFKG), and N’Koltang (NKLG) stations during the storm’s main phase. During the recovery phase, an increase in TEC was observed at the ADIS and DJIG stations, whereas depletions occurred at the other stations. This study used correlation coefficients (r) and root mean square errors (RMSE) to examine the variation of the IRI-2020 TEC from the Global Positioning System (GPS) TEC during the storm. The results show that the model performs better at some stations (ABPO, MFKG, ZAMB) but underestimates at others (ADIS, DJIG, YKRO). Analysis of the magnetometer data indicates that the H component of the magnetic field experiences a larger disturbance at Keetmanshoop (KMH) than at Hermanus (HER). These results provide crucial insights into storm-time electrodynamics over equatorial and low-latitude regions of Africa and highlight the vulnerability of regional navigation systems.
| Published in | American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Volume 13, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13 |
| Page(s) | 32-44 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Geomagnetic Storm, Ionosphere, Total Electron Content (TEC), GPS Scintillation, Space Weather, Africa
| [1] | Richa Trivedi, Amit Jain, Sudhir Jain, and AK Gwal. Study of tec changes during geomagnetic storms occurred near the crest of the equatorial ionospheric ionization anomaly in the indian sector. Advances in space research, 48(10): 1617–1630, 2011. |
| [2] | Emma C McGinness, Thomas J Immel, Brian J Harding, Yen-Jung Wu, and Colin C Triplett. The effects of a small geomagnetic storm on earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere: Icon observations of the 25 january 2021 disturbance. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 128(7): e2022JA031207, 2023. |
| [3] | Bela G Fejer, John W Jensen, and Shin-Yi Su. Seasonal and longitudinal dependence of equatorial disturbance vertical plasma drifts. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(20), 2008. |
| [4] | KC Yeh and Ch Liu. Radio wave scintillations in the ionosphere. Proceedings of the IEEE, 70(4): 324–360, 1982. |
| [5] | Paul M Kintner, Brent M Ledvina, and Eurico R de Paula. Gps and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather, 5(9), 2007. |
| [6] | Dongsheng Zhao, Shuanglei Cui, Xueli Zhang, Longjiang Li, Peng Sun, Chaofa Bian, Wei Ban, Craig M Hancock, Qianxin Wang, and Kefei Zhang. Analysis of global ionospheric scintillation and gps positioning interference triggered by full-halo cme-driven geomagnetic storm: A case study. Advances in Space Research, 74(5): 2492–2509, 2024. |
| [7] | AO Akala, EO Oyeyemi, PO Amaechi, SM Radicella, B Nava, and Christine Amory-Mazaudier. Longitudinal responses of the equatorial/low-latitude ionosphere over the oceanic regions to geomagnetic storms of may and september 2017. Journal of Geophysical Research: space physics, 125(8): e2020JA027963, 2020. |
| [8] | Michael Mendillo. Storms in the ionosphere: Patterns and processes for total electron content. Reviews of Geophysics, 44(4), 2006. |
| [9] | Bela G Fejer and Ludger Scherliess. Time dependent response of equatorial ionospheric electric fields to magnetospheric disturbances. Geophysical Research Letters, 22(7): 851–854, 1995. |
| [10] | LCA Resende, JK Shi, CM Denardini, IS Batista, PAB Nogueira, C Arras, VF Andrioli, J Moro, LA Da Silva, AJ Carrasco, et al. The influence of disturbance dynamo electric field in the formation of strong sporadic e layers over boa vista, a low-latitude station in the american sector. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125(7): e2019JA027519, 2020. |
| [11] | Bruce T Tsurutani, OP Verkhoglyadova, AJ Mannucci, A Saito, T Araki, K Yumoto, T Tsuda, Mangalathayil Ali Abdu, José Humberto Andrade Sobral, Walter D Gonzalez, et al. Prompt penetration electric fields (ppefs) and their ionospheric effects during the great magnetic storm of 30–31 october 2003. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 113(A5), 2008. |
| [12] | Elvira Astafyeva, Irina Zakharenkova, and Patrick Alken. Prompt penetration electric fields and the extreme topside ionospheric response to the june 22–23, 2015 geomagnetic storm as seen by the swarm constellation. Earth, Planets and Space, 68(1): 152, 2016. |
| [13] | Chao-Song Huang, John C Foster, and Michael C Kelley. Long-duration penetration of the interplanetary electric field to the low-latitude ionosphere during the main phase of magnetic storms. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 110(A11), 2005. |
| [14] | MC Kelley, Bela G Fejer, and CA Gonzales. An explanation for anomalous equatorial ionospheric electric fields associated with a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field. Geophysical Research Letters, 6(4): 301–304, 1979. |
| [15] | Jinghua Li, Guanyi Ma, Jiangtao Fan, Qingtao Wan, Takashi Maruyama, Jie Zhang, Chi-Kuang Chao, Liang Dong, Dong Wang, Yang Gao, et al. The characteristics and possible mechanisms of the strongest ionospheric irregularities in march 2024. Atmosphere, 16(2): 218, 2025. |
| [16] | M Kelley. The earth’s ionosphere: Plasma physics and electrodynamics, int. Geophys. Ser, 43: 437–455, 1989. |
| [17] | Lin MM Myint, Septi Perwitasari, Michi Nishioka, Susumu Saito, Rungnapa Kaewthongrach, and Pornchai Supnithi. Analysis of ionospheric and geomagnetic fields changes in thailand during the may 2024 geomagnetic storm. Advances in Space Research, 2025. |
| [18] | Yong Wei, Biqiang Zhao, Guozhu Li, and Weixing Wan. Electric field penetration into earth’s ionosphere: A brief review for 2000–2013. Science Bulletin, 60(8): 748–761, 2015. |
| [19] | Atsuki Shinbori, Yuichi Otsuka, Takuya Sori, Takuya Tsugawa, and Michi Nishioka. Temporal and spatial variations of total electron content enhancements during a geomagnetic storm on 27 and 28 september 2017. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125(7): e2019JA026873, 2020. |
| [20] | AJ Mannucci, BT Tsurutani, BA Iijima, A Komjathy, A Saito, WD Gonzalez, FL Guarnieri, JU Kozyra, and R Skoug. Dayside global ionospheric response to the major interplanetary events of october 29–30, 2003 “halloween storms”. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(12), 2005. |
| [21] | S Ray, B Roy, and A Das. Occurrence of equatorial spread f during intense geomagnetic storms. Radio Science, 50(7): 563–573, 2015. |
| [22] | LM Joshi, S Sripathi, and Ram Singh. Simulation of low-latitude ionospheric response to 2015 st. patrick’s day super geomagnetic storm using ionosonde-derived pre vertical drifts over indian region. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 121(3): 2489–2502, 2016. |
| [23] | T Biswas, A Paul, and S Haldar. Response of equatorial ionosphere to the geomagnetic superstorm of may 2024: Observations from the indian longitudes. Advances in Space Research, 2025. |
| [24] | Jun Tang, Xin Gao, Yinjian Li, and Zhengyu Zhong. Study of ionospheric responses over china during september 7–8, 2017 using gps, beidou (geo), and swarm satellite observations. GPS Solutions, 26(2): 55, 2022. |
| [25] | Jun Tang, Xin Gao, Dengpan Yang, Zhengyu Zhong, Xingliang Huo, and Xuequn Wu. Local persistent ionospheric positive responses to the geomagnetic storm in august 2018 using bds-geo satellites over low-latitude regions in eastern hemisphere. Remote Sensing, 14(9): 2272, 2022. |
| [26] | D Lissa, VKD Srinivasu, DSVVD Prasad, and K Niranjan. Ionospheric response to the 26 august 2018 geomagnetic storm using gps-tec observations along 80 e and 120 e longitudes in the asian sector. Advances in Space Research, 66(6): 1427–1440, 2020. |
| [27] | Roshan Kumar Mishra, Binod Adhikari, Narayan Prasad Chapagain, Rabin Baral, Priyanka Kumari Das, Virginia Klausner, and Manisha Sharma. Variation on solar wind parameters and total electron content over middle-to low-latitude regions during intense geomagnetic storms. Radio Science, 55(11): e2020RS007129, 2020. |
| [28] | SO Ikubanni, SJ Adebiyi, BO Adebesin, KO Dopamu, BW Joshua, OS Bolaji, and BJ Adekoya. Response of gps-tec in the african equatorial region to the two recent st. patrick’s day storms. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(10): 1773–1790, 2018. |
| [29] | David Roma-Dollase, Manuel Hernández-Pajares, Andrzej Krankowski, Kacper Kotulak, Reza Ghoddousi-Fard, Yunbin Yuan, Zishen Li, Hongping Zhang, Chuang Shi, Cheng Wang, et al. Consistency of seven different gnss global ionospheric mapping techniques during one solar cycle. Journal of Geodesy, 92(6): 691–706, 2018. |
| [30] | Bernhard Hofmann-Wellenhof, Herbert Lichtenegger, and James Collins. Global positioning system: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. |
| [31] | MA Abdu. Equatorial spread f/plasma bubble irregularities under storm time disturbance electric fields. Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics, 75: 44–56, 2012. |
| [32] | Yu I Yermolaev and M Yu Yermolaev. Statistic study on the geomagnetic storm effectiveness of solar and interplanetary events. Advances in Space research, 37(6): 1175–1181, 2006. |
| [33] | Viviane Pierrard, Tobias GW Verhulst, Jean-Marie Chevalier, Nicolas Bergeot, and Alexandre Winant. Effects of the geomagnetic superstorms of 10–11 may 2024 and 7–11 october 2024 on the ionosphere and plasmasphere. Atmosphere, 16(3): 299, 2025. |
| [34] | Krishnendu Sekhar Paul, Haris Haralambous, Mefe Moses, and Sharad C Tripathi. Effects of the october 2024 storm over the global ionosphere. Remote Sensing, 17(13): 2329, 2025. |
| [35] | John A Klobuchar. Ionospheric effects on gps. Chapter 12 of global positioning system: Theory and applications, 1: 30, 1996. |
| [36] | Gopi Krishna Seemala. Estimation of ionospheric total electron content (tec) from gnss observations. In Atmospheric remote sensing, pages 63–84. Elsevier, 2023. |
| [37] | Wallace Hall Campbell. Introduction to geomagnetic fields. Cambridge University Press, 2003. |
| [38] | Atsuhiro Nishida. Geomagnetic dp 2 fluctuations and associated magnetospheric phenomena. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73(5): 1795–1803, 1968. |
| [39] | Amira Shimeis, Ibrahim Fathy, Christine Amory-Mazaudier, Rolland Fleury, Ayman Mohamed Mahrous, Kiyohumi Yumoto, and K Groves. Signature of the coronal hole near the north crest equatorial anomaly over egypt during the strong geomagnetic storm 5 april 2010. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 117(A7), 2012. |
| [40] | Ibrahim Fathy, Christine Amory-Mazaudier, A Fathy, AM Mahrous, K Yumoto, and E Ghamry. Ionospheric disturbance dynamo associated to a coronal hole: Case study of 5–10 april 2010. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 119(5): 4120–4133, 2014. |
| [41] | Minh Le Huy and Christine Amory-Mazaudier. Magnetic signature of the ionospheric disturbance dynamo at equatorial latitudes: “ddyn”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 110(A10), 2005. |
| [42] | Wellen Rukundo. The ionospheric dynamics of the african sector responding to a severe geomagnetic storm; the storm of 3–5 november 2021. Space Weather, 21(3): e2022SW003219, 2023. |
| [43] | Olwendo Ouko Joseph, Yosuke Yamazak, Pierre Cilliers, Paul Baki, Chigomezyo M Ngwira, and Collins Mito. A study on the response of the equatorial ionization anomaly over the east africa sector during the geomagnetic storm of november 13, 2012. Advances in Space Research, 55(12): 2863–2872, 2015. |
| [44] | PVS Rama Rao, S Gopi Krishna, J Vara Prasad, SNVS Prasad, DSVVD Prasad, and K Niranjan. Geomagnetic storm effects on gps based navigation. In Annales Geophysicae, volume 27, pages 2101–2110. Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany, 2009. |
| [45] | TJ Immel and AJ Mannucci. Ionospheric redistribution during geomagnetic storms. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 118(12): 7928–7939, 2013. |
| [46] | Ahmed Sherif, Mostafa Rabah, Ashraf ElKutb Mousa, Ahmed Zaki, and Ahmed Sedeek. Assessing the performance of iri-2016 and iri-2020 models using cosmic-2 gnss radio occultation tec data under different magnetic activities over egypt. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 18(1): 163–176, 2024. |
| [47] | Yusuf Olanrewaju Kayode, Femi Emmanuel Ikuemonisan, Lurwan Garba, Daniel Okoh, and Adam Folohunsho Zubair. Assessing the performance of iri-2020 and iri-2016 during quiet and storm periods using total electron content in different longitudinal sectors and suggestions for improvements of the models. Advances in Space Research, 2025. |
| [48] | Sidney Chapman and Vincent CA Ferraro. A new theory of magnetic storms. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, 38(2): 79–96, 1933. |
| [49] | Walter D Gonzalez, Jo Ann Joselyn, Yohsuke Kamide, Herbert W Kroehl, Gordon Rostoker, Bruce T Tsurutani, and Vytenis M Vasyliunas. What is a geomagnetic storm? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 99(A4): 5771–5792, 1994. |
| [50] | Tingting Yu, Wenbin Wang, Zhipeng Ren, Xuguang Cai, and Maosheng He. Vertical variations in thermospheric o/n2 and the relationship between o and n2 perturbations during a geomagnetic storm. Earth and Space Science, 10(10): e2023EA002988, 2023. |
| [51] | Kevin H Pham, Binzheng Zhang, Kareem Sorathia, Tong Dang, Wenbin Wang, Viacheslav Merkin, Huixin Liu, Dong Lin, Michael Wiltberger, Jiuhou Lei, et al. Thermospheric density perturbations produced by traveling atmospheric disturbances during august 2005 storm. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 127(2): e2021JA030071, 2022. |
| [52] | AD Richmond and G Lu. Upper-atmospheric effects of magnetic storms: a brief tutorial. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 62(12): 1115–1127, 2000. |
| [53] | Nadia Imtiaz, Waqar Younas, and Majid Khan. Response of the low-to mid-latitude ionosphere to the geomagnetic storm of september 2017. In Annales Geophysicae, volume 38, pages 359–372. Copernicus GmbH, 2020. |
| [54] | PM De Siqueira, ER De Paula, MTAH Muella, LFC Rezende, MA Abdu, and WD Gonzalez. Storm-time total electron content and its response to penetration electric fields over south america. In Annales Geophysicae, volume 29, pages 1765–1778. Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany, 2011. |
APA Style
Mogasa, L. T. (2026). The Effects of the Geomagnetic Storm of October 2024 on the African Ionosphere. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13
ACS Style
Mogasa, L. T. The Effects of the Geomagnetic Storm of October 2024 on the African Ionosphere. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2026, 13(1), 32-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13,
author = {Lamessa Tamasgen Mogasa},
title = {The Effects of the Geomagnetic Storm of October 2024 on the African Ionosphere},
journal = {American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics},
volume = {13},
number = {1},
pages = {32-44},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaa.20261301.13},
abstract = {This study investigates the ionospheric response over the equatorial and low-latitude regions in African during the geomagnetic storm that occurred on 10–11 October 2024. In order to investigate the ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of varying intensities, a detailed study of vertical Total Electron Content (TEC) variations resulting from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and International Reference Ionosphere 2020 (IRI2020) data acquired at the Africa sector has been carried out in this work. The data used include GNSS measurements from International GNSS Service (IGS) African eight stations, IRI2020 model, O/N2 ratio information obtained by the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics/Global Ultraviolet Imager (TIMED/GUVI), magnetometer data, and an ionospheric electric fields model. The integrity of GNSS is critically dependent on the state of the Earth’s ionosphere. During space weather events like geomagnetic storms, the ionosphere can become highly disturbed, leading to signal scintillations and severe degradation of navigation reliability. The deviation in TEC was used to observe the ionospheric storm effects. The results show both positive enhancements and negative depletions in TEC across the stations during the events. The findings reveal significant TEC enhancements over the Yamoussoukro (YKRO) and Lusaka (ZAMB) stations, while reductions were observed at the Antananarivo (ABPO), Addis Ababa (ADIS), Djibouti (DJIG), Malindi (MAL2), Mafikeng (MFKG), and N’Koltang (NKLG) stations during the storm’s main phase. During the recovery phase, an increase in TEC was observed at the ADIS and DJIG stations, whereas depletions occurred at the other stations. This study used correlation coefficients (r) and root mean square errors (RMSE) to examine the variation of the IRI-2020 TEC from the Global Positioning System (GPS) TEC during the storm. The results show that the model performs better at some stations (ABPO, MFKG, ZAMB) but underestimates at others (ADIS, DJIG, YKRO). Analysis of the magnetometer data indicates that the H component of the magnetic field experiences a larger disturbance at Keetmanshoop (KMH) than at Hermanus (HER). These results provide crucial insights into storm-time electrodynamics over equatorial and low-latitude regions of Africa and highlight the vulnerability of regional navigation systems.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effects of the Geomagnetic Storm of October 2024 on the African Ionosphere AU - Lamessa Tamasgen Mogasa Y1 - 2026/03/18 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13 T2 - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics JF - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics JO - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics SP - 32 EP - 44 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-4686 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20261301.13 AB - This study investigates the ionospheric response over the equatorial and low-latitude regions in African during the geomagnetic storm that occurred on 10–11 October 2024. In order to investigate the ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of varying intensities, a detailed study of vertical Total Electron Content (TEC) variations resulting from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and International Reference Ionosphere 2020 (IRI2020) data acquired at the Africa sector has been carried out in this work. The data used include GNSS measurements from International GNSS Service (IGS) African eight stations, IRI2020 model, O/N2 ratio information obtained by the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics/Global Ultraviolet Imager (TIMED/GUVI), magnetometer data, and an ionospheric electric fields model. The integrity of GNSS is critically dependent on the state of the Earth’s ionosphere. During space weather events like geomagnetic storms, the ionosphere can become highly disturbed, leading to signal scintillations and severe degradation of navigation reliability. The deviation in TEC was used to observe the ionospheric storm effects. The results show both positive enhancements and negative depletions in TEC across the stations during the events. The findings reveal significant TEC enhancements over the Yamoussoukro (YKRO) and Lusaka (ZAMB) stations, while reductions were observed at the Antananarivo (ABPO), Addis Ababa (ADIS), Djibouti (DJIG), Malindi (MAL2), Mafikeng (MFKG), and N’Koltang (NKLG) stations during the storm’s main phase. During the recovery phase, an increase in TEC was observed at the ADIS and DJIG stations, whereas depletions occurred at the other stations. This study used correlation coefficients (r) and root mean square errors (RMSE) to examine the variation of the IRI-2020 TEC from the Global Positioning System (GPS) TEC during the storm. The results show that the model performs better at some stations (ABPO, MFKG, ZAMB) but underestimates at others (ADIS, DJIG, YKRO). Analysis of the magnetometer data indicates that the H component of the magnetic field experiences a larger disturbance at Keetmanshoop (KMH) than at Hermanus (HER). These results provide crucial insights into storm-time electrodynamics over equatorial and low-latitude regions of Africa and highlight the vulnerability of regional navigation systems. VL - 13 IS - 1 ER -