To ascertain the quality of water used for drinking purpose, by the consumers and wildlife, water quality monitoring of the groundwater and surface water sources was conducted in Pench Tiger Reserve area in Maharashtra. The fecal streptococci (FS) and fecal coliforms (FC) ranged from 0-5 CFU/100ml and 0-62 CFU/100ml respectively. The bacterial contamination in groundwater may be because of improper source protection and possibility of enroute contamination. Geogenic background has major impact on groundwater quality in Pench with gneisses and basaltic type of formation which reflect on the physicochemical water quality parameters. Water quality parameters like turbidity, fluoride, iron and bacterial counts are above the permissible limit in some water sources making the water unsuitable for drinking purpose. The high turbidity in the groundwater samples is attributed to the presence of iron precipitates. Study area is covered with red ferruginous soils which are rich in iron and contributes to iron content in groundwater. Appropriate treatment is required to reduce down the iron and fluoride concentrations followed by disinfection so that the water quality parameters fulfill BIS guidelines for potability of water. The correlation and regression analysis among different water quality parameters helps in establishing relationships among water quality parameters drawing inferences about them. Water quality monitoring at regular interval with suitable treatment measures is very much essential to provide safe drinking water to the consumers.
Published in | Advances in Applied Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12 |
Page(s) | 31-36 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Iron, Fluoride, Fecal Streptococci, Fecal Coliform, Disinfection
S. N. | Location | S. N. | Location | S. N. | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ghotigate HP | 8 | Hattigota protection hut HP | 15 | Salama gate (Dugwell) |
2 | Tuyapar protectin hut HP | 9 | Bhimsen HP | 16 | Bakhari protection HP |
3 | Kirrangi sarra protection hut HP | 10 | Saddle dam protection hut HP | 17 | Sillari cheaking gate HP |
4 | Kirrangi sarra cheaking gate HP | 11 | Nagdev pahadi Tippat HP | 18 | Sillary colony HP |
5 | Research centre Ranidhoh HP | 12 | Pivathali protection hut HP | 19 | Pipariya forest colony HP |
6 | Hattigota HP | 13 | Dugout Pond (surface water) | 20 | Pauni gate HP |
7 | Sadisarra HP | 14 | Chikhaldari HP |
Parameters | BIS: 10500 2012 | WHO: 1996 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 6.5-8.5 | 6.5-8.5 | 6.9 | 7 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 7 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
Turbidity (NTU) | 5-10 | 161 | 25 | 484 | 10 | 33 | 67 | 102 | 292 | 61 | 1 | |
EC (μS/cm) | 475 | 760 | 460 | 522 | 448 | 437 | 647 | 573 | 750 | 875 | ||
TDS | 500-2000 | 285 | 456 | 276 | 313 | 269 | 262 | 388 | 344 | 450 | 525 | |
TH | 300-600 | 204 | 400 | 164 | 212 | 172 | 184 | 248 | 232 | 192 | 452 | |
Ca (meq/L) | 75-200 | 2.72 | 4.8 | 1.84 | 1.92 | 2 | 2.4 | 4.32 | 2.8 | 3.36 | 4.16 | |
Mg (meq/L) | 30-100 | 1.36 | 3.2 | 1.44 | 2.32 | 1.44 | 1.28 | 0.64 | 1.84 | 0.48 | 4.88 | |
Na | 38.8 | 74.2 | 37 | 33.9 | 32.2 | 26.1 | 43.5 | 32.5 | 71.5 | 4.7 | ||
K | 2.9 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 3.6 | ||
HCO3 | 244-732 | 132 | 142 | 132 | 84 | 134 | 118 | 197 | 168 | 194 | 259 | |
Alkalinity | 200-600 | 120 | 220 | 236 | 220 | 140 | 224 | 196 | 328 | 280 | 324 | 432 |
Cl | 250 | 250 | 20 | 28 | 16 | 46 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 16 |
SO4 | 200-400 | 200-400 | 1 | 195 | 1.3 | 17.9 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 |
NO3 | 45 | 50 | 0.6 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 25 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 8.8 |
F | 1.0-1.5 | 1.0-1.5 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
Fe | 0.3-1.0 | 0.3-1.0 | 4 | 0.4 | 4.1 | 3 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 0.2 |
FC (CFU/ 100 ml) | 0 | 0 | 32 | ND | 2 | ND | ND | TNTC | 2 | ND | ND | ND |
FS (CFU/ 100 ml) | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | 1 | ND | 4 | 5 | ND | ND | ND |
Parameters | BIS: 10500 2012 | WHO: 1996 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 6.5-8.5 | 6.5-8.5 | 8 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 6.9 | 7.2 | 7.4 |
Turbidity (NTU) | 5-10 | 25 | 17 | 95 | 86 | 1 | 263 | 407 | 361 | 1 | 1 | |
EC (μS/cm) | 393 | 649 | 117 | 962 | 1033 | 723 | 700 | 1060 | 609 | 1063 | ||
TDS | 500-2000 | 236 | 389 | 70 | 577 | 620 | 434 | 420 | 636 | 365 | 638 | |
TH | 300-600 | 132 | 248 | 52 | 340 | 288 | 280 | 296 | 476 | 236 | 188 | |
Ca (meq/L) | 75-200 | 1.92 | 3.12 | 0.4 | 5.04 | 4.32 | 4 | 4 | 6.72 | 3.44 | 1.68 | |
Mg (meq/L) | 30-100 | 0.72 | 1.84 | 0.64 | 1.76 | 1.44 | 1.6 | 1.92 | 2.8 | 1.28 | 2.08 | |
Na | 43.9 | 42.4 | 6.3 | 77 | 81.6 | 40.8 | 34.5 | 27.1 | 7.4 | 141 | ||
K | 2.6 | 7.2 | 5.5 | 6.3 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 3.9 | ||
HCO3 | 244-732 | 103 | 173 | 31 | 250 | 240 | 180 | 204 | 204 | 144 | 266 | |
Alkalinity | 200-600 | 120 | 172 | 288 | 52 | 416 | 400 | 300 | 340 | 340 | 240 | 444 |
Cl | 250 | 250 | 12 | 16 | 8 | 62 | 32 | 14 | 18 | 92 | 14 | 50 |
SO4 | 200-400 | 200-400 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 22.5 | 5.6 | 18 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 38.9 | 3.3 | 11 |
NO3 | 45 | 50 | 1 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 14.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 18 | 19.2 |
F | 1.0-1.5 | 1.0-1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.4 | 1.8 |
Fe | 0.3-1.0 | 0.3-1.0 | 2.1 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
FC (CFU/ 100 ml) | 0 | 0 | TNTC | 62 | TNTC | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
FS (CFU/ 100 ml) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
pH | EC | Turb. | TDS | Fe | TH | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | K+ | Cl | NO3- | SO42- | Alk. | F- | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
EC | -0.21 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
Turb. | -0.33 | -0.04 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
TDS | -0.21 | 1.00 | -0.04 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
Fe | -0.25 | -0.47 | 0.53 | -0.47 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
TH | -0.44 | 0.74 | 0.11 | 0.74 | -0.34 | 1.00 | |||||||||
Ca2+ | -0.34 | 0.73 | 0.18 | 0.73 | -0.17 | 0.90 | 1.00 | ||||||||
Mg2+ | -0.41 | 0.47 | -0.03 | 0.47 | -0.46 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 1.00 | |||||||
Na+ | 0.15 | 0.57 | -0.22 | 0.57 | -0.32 | 0.01 | 0.06 | -0.07 | 1.00 | ||||||
K+ | -0.02 | -0.10 | -0.34 | -0.10 | 0.19 | -0.18 | -0.26 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 1.00 | |||||
Cl- | -0.26 | 0.66 | 0.11 | 0.66 | -0.07 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.35 | -0.04 | 1.00 | ||||
NO3- | -0.02 | 0.27 | -0.49 | 0.27 | -0.68 | 0.03 | -0.14 | 0.27 | 0.26 | -0.15 | 0.23 | 1.00 | |||
SO42- | -0.12 | 0.15 | -0.13 | 0.15 | -0.37 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 1.00 | ||
Alk | -0.16 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.90 | -0.38 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.03 | 0.39 | 0.08 | -0.11 | 1.00 | |
F- | 0.27 | 0.57 | 0.06 | 0.57 | -0.43 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.71 | -0.25 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 1.00 |
WHO | World Health Organization |
BIS | Bureau of Indian Standards |
CPCB | Central Pollution Control Board |
DO | Dissolved Oxygen |
BOD | Biochemical Oxygen Demand |
COD | Chemical Oxygen Demand |
NTU | Nephelometric Turbidity Unit |
EC | Electrical Conductivity |
TDS | Total Dissolved Salts |
FC | Fecal Coliforms |
FS | Fecal Streptococci |
[1] | Jothivenkatachalam, K., Nithya, A. & Chandra Mohan, S. Correlation analysis of drinking water quality in and around Perur block of Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu, India. Rasayan Journal Chemistry, 3(4), 2010, pp. 649-654. |
[2] | Champidi, P., Stamatis, G. &. Zangana, E., Groundwater quality assessment and geogenic and anthropogenic effect estimation in Erasinos basin (E. Attica). Europian water, 33, 2011, pp. 11-27. |
[3] | Biswas, S. P. & Boruah, S., Ecology of the river Dolphin (Platanista Gangetica) in the upper Brahmaputra. Hydrbiologia, 430, 2000, pp. 97-101. |
[4] | Wesley Godwin, S. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by industrial mollusks of Kanyakumari water. Poll. Res., 23(1), 2000, pp. 37- 40. |
[5] | Khan, N., Mathur, A. and Mathur, R., A study on drinking water quality in Laskhar (Gwalior). Indian J. Env. Prot., 25(3), 2004, pp. 222-224. |
[6] | Akinbile, C. O. & Yusoff, M. S., Environmental impact of leachate pollution on groundwater supplies in Akure, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2(1), 2011, pp. 81-89. |
[7] | Daraigan, S. G., Wahdain Ahmed, A. S., Ba-Mosa, S., ObidManal, H., Linear correlation analysis study of drinking water quality data for Al-Mukalla City, Hadhramout. Yemen International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(7), 2011. |
[8] | Gajendaran, C. & Thamarai, P. Study on statistical relationship between groundwater quality parameters in Nambiyar river basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Poll. Res., 27(4), 2008, pp. 679-683. |
[9] | Khan, M. A., Umar, R., Baten, M. A., Lateh, H. and Kamil, A. A., Seasonal variations in groundwater quality: A statistical approach. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 7(25), 2012, pp. 4026-4035. Available at |
[10] | FAO, Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Papers. 1994, Available at |
[11] | Khadse, G. K., Patni P. M., Kelkar P. S. & Devotta S., Qualitative evaluation of Kanhan River and its tributaries flowing over central Indian plateau. Environ. Monit. Assess., 147, 2008, pp. 83-92. |
[12] |
Save Tigers: Available at endangered-tiger.
blogspot.com/2010/03/tiger-reserves-in-india.html accessed on 10.07.2012 |
[13] | Wikramanayake, E. D., Dinerstein, E., Robinson, G., Karanth, U., Rabinowitz, A., Olson, D., Mathew, T., Hedao, P., Conner, M. Hemley, G. & Bolze, D. An ecology-based method for defining priorities for large mammal conservation: The Tiger as case study. Conservation Biology, 12, 1998, pp. 865–878. |
[14] |
Pench Jungle Camp. About Pench Tiger Reserve. Available at
http://www.wildlife-camp-india.com/about-pench-tiger-reserve.html accessed on: 10.07.2012. |
[15] | CPCB., Groundwater Quality Series: GWQS/09/2006-2007. Status of groundwater quality in India, part -I. Central Pollution Control Board, (Ministry of Environment & Forests). |
[16] | APHA., Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Waste water, (20th ed.). Washington, D.C., 1999: APHA. |
[17] | APHA, AWWA, & WEF., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, (21st ed.). Washington, D.C., 2005: APHA. |
[18] | Greenberg, A. E., Connors, J. J., Jenkins, D. & Franson, M. A., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, (15th ed.). Washington, D. C., 1995: APHA. |
[19] | Kumar, N. & Sinha, D. K.,. Drinking water quality management through correlation studies among various physicochemical parameters: a case study. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(2), 2010, pp. 253-259. |
[20] | Mehta, K. V., Physicochemical characteristics and statistical study of groundwater of some places of Vadgamtaluka in Banaskantha district of Gujarat state (India), Journal of Chemical Pharmaceutical Research, 2(4), 2010, pp. 663-670. |
[21] | Patil, V. T., & Patil, P. R., Physicochemical analysis of selected groundwater samples of Amalner town in Jalgaon district, Maharashtra, India. Electronic Journal of Chemistry, 7(1), 2010, pp. 111-116. |
[22] |
EPA, Guidance Manual Turbidity Provisions 7-10 April, 1999. Web Address:
http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/mdbp/pdf/turbidity/chap_07.pdf on dated: 1.05.2012. |
[23] | BIS, Specifications for Drinking Water, IS: 10500: 2012, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. |
[24] | Chavassieux, P., Bone effects of fluoride in animal models in vivo: a review and a recent study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 5(S1), 1990, S95–S99. |
[25] | Sutie J. W., Effects of fluoride on livestock. J. Occup. Med. (1). 1977, 40-8. |
[26] | Jain, S. K., Agarwal, P. K. & Singh, V. P., Krishna and Godavari basins, Hydrology and water resources of India, vol. 57, 2007, pp. 641-699. |
[27] | WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality (3rd ed.) incorporating 1st and 2nd addenda, Recommendations. Geneva, (1), 2008, 216. |
[28] | CPCB. The Gazette of India. Extraordinary, Part II, 1993. Ministry of Environment and Forest and Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Forest. |
APA Style
Khadse, G., Narnaware, S. (2024). Qualitative Assessment of Water Sources in Pench Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra. Advances in Applied Sciences, 9(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12
ACS Style
Khadse, G.; Narnaware, S. Qualitative Assessment of Water Sources in Pench Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2024, 9(2), 31-36. doi: 10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12
AMA Style
Khadse G, Narnaware S. Qualitative Assessment of Water Sources in Pench Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra. Adv Appl Sci. 2024;9(2):31-36. doi: 10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12
@article{10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12, author = {Gajanan Khadse and Sandip Narnaware}, title = {Qualitative Assessment of Water Sources in Pench Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra }, journal = {Advances in Applied Sciences}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {31-36}, doi = {10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aas.20240902.12}, abstract = {To ascertain the quality of water used for drinking purpose, by the consumers and wildlife, water quality monitoring of the groundwater and surface water sources was conducted in Pench Tiger Reserve area in Maharashtra. The fecal streptococci (FS) and fecal coliforms (FC) ranged from 0-5 CFU/100ml and 0-62 CFU/100ml respectively. The bacterial contamination in groundwater may be because of improper source protection and possibility of enroute contamination. Geogenic background has major impact on groundwater quality in Pench with gneisses and basaltic type of formation which reflect on the physicochemical water quality parameters. Water quality parameters like turbidity, fluoride, iron and bacterial counts are above the permissible limit in some water sources making the water unsuitable for drinking purpose. The high turbidity in the groundwater samples is attributed to the presence of iron precipitates. Study area is covered with red ferruginous soils which are rich in iron and contributes to iron content in groundwater. Appropriate treatment is required to reduce down the iron and fluoride concentrations followed by disinfection so that the water quality parameters fulfill BIS guidelines for potability of water. The correlation and regression analysis among different water quality parameters helps in establishing relationships among water quality parameters drawing inferences about them. Water quality monitoring at regular interval with suitable treatment measures is very much essential to provide safe drinking water to the consumers. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Qualitative Assessment of Water Sources in Pench Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra AU - Gajanan Khadse AU - Sandip Narnaware Y1 - 2024/07/02 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12 DO - 10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12 T2 - Advances in Applied Sciences JF - Advances in Applied Sciences JO - Advances in Applied Sciences SP - 31 EP - 36 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1514 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240902.12 AB - To ascertain the quality of water used for drinking purpose, by the consumers and wildlife, water quality monitoring of the groundwater and surface water sources was conducted in Pench Tiger Reserve area in Maharashtra. The fecal streptococci (FS) and fecal coliforms (FC) ranged from 0-5 CFU/100ml and 0-62 CFU/100ml respectively. The bacterial contamination in groundwater may be because of improper source protection and possibility of enroute contamination. Geogenic background has major impact on groundwater quality in Pench with gneisses and basaltic type of formation which reflect on the physicochemical water quality parameters. Water quality parameters like turbidity, fluoride, iron and bacterial counts are above the permissible limit in some water sources making the water unsuitable for drinking purpose. The high turbidity in the groundwater samples is attributed to the presence of iron precipitates. Study area is covered with red ferruginous soils which are rich in iron and contributes to iron content in groundwater. Appropriate treatment is required to reduce down the iron and fluoride concentrations followed by disinfection so that the water quality parameters fulfill BIS guidelines for potability of water. The correlation and regression analysis among different water quality parameters helps in establishing relationships among water quality parameters drawing inferences about them. Water quality monitoring at regular interval with suitable treatment measures is very much essential to provide safe drinking water to the consumers. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -